Turnover process models: Review and synthesis of a conceptual literature

By Robert P. Steel, John W. Lounsbury. 2009

264 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Testing a Model of Officer Intentions to Quit (2014, methodology): “There are a range of models that can be used to describe and examine the voluntary turnover process (for reviews, see Holtom, Mitchell, Lee, & Eberly, 2008; Steel & Lounsbury, 2009), and one of the most frequently cited models is that developed by Mobley and colleagues (1979).”
A Multilevel Investigation of Leadership and Turnover Behavior (2015, background): “…or why members participate in as well as withdraw from organizations (March & Simon, 1958), contemporary scholars increasingly focus on the motives and psychology of staying that differ from those of leaving (Hom, Mitchell, Lee, & Griffeth, 2012; Mitchell & Lee, 2001; Steel & Lounsbury, 2009).”
High-performance work system and intention to leave: a mediation model (2014, background): “Recent literature review by Steel and Lounsbury (2009) highlights the role of job satisfaction in almost every turnover theory, because of its power to capture desirability of movement.”
Job Search and Voluntary Turnover in a Boundaryless world: a Control Theory Perspective (2011, background): “THE VOLUNTARY TURNOVER LITERATURE Because job satisfaction is thought to capture the desirability of movement, it has played an integral role in nearly all turnover theories (Steel & Lounsbury, 2009).”