Sexual Harassment: The Relationship of Personal Vulnerability, Work Context, Perpetrator Status, and Type of Harassment to Outcomes.

By Colleen O’Connell, K. Korabik. 2000

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/149861360102abfa1fd1e55a2c6263e059bcb2de

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Comparing Sexual Harassment Subtypes Among Black and White Women by Military Rank: Double Jeopardy, the Jezebel, and the Cult of True Womanhood (2008, background): “Depression, posttraumatic stress, and work withdrawal are among a host of individual negative consequences associated with sexual harassment (see Avina & O’Donohue, 2002; Fitzgerald, Drasgow, Hulin, Gelfand, & Magley, 1997; O’Connell & Korabik, 2000).”
Derogation, Discrimination, and (Dis)Satisfaction With Jobs in Science (2013, background): “…harmful to targets and have been associated with numerous negative psychological outcomes (Avina & O’Donohue, 2002; Munson, Hulin, & Drasgow, 2000; O’Connell & Korabik, 2000; Settles, Buchanan, & Colar, 2012; Settles, Harrell, Buchanan, & Yap, 2011) and work outcomes, such as lower job…”
Sex-based harassment and organizational silencing: How women are led to reluctant acquiescence in academia (2018, background): “It should equally be underscored that women are potentially more vulnerable to sex-based harassment as, overall, they occupy less powerful organizational positions (O’Connell and Korabik, 2000).”
Beyond Blaming the Victim: Toward a More Progressive Understanding of Workplace Mistreatment (2017, background): “Research further finds that sexual harassment perpetrators are more likely to be higher (vs. lower) in status (e.g., Lopez, Hodson, & Roscigno, 2009; O’Connell & Korabik, 2000; Sojo, Wood, & Genat, 2016).”
Workplace harassment among staff in higher education: a systematic review (2017, methodology): “The most common cause for harassment identified by this systematic review, mainly through surveys, was the prevalence of discrimination based on gender differences (Aguirre Jr 2000; Benson 1998; Bjorkqvist et al. 1994; Dekker and Barling 1998; Freels et al. 2005; Hu et al. 1996; Lewis 1999; McKinney”
From Insult to Injury: Explaining the Impact of Incivility (2007, methodology): “…of specific (i.e., targeted) mistreatment, however, there have been studies of same-status perpetrators in the sexual harassment literature (e.g., O’Connell & Korabik, 2000). key determinant of vulnerability to mistreatment (e.g., Tangri, Burt, & Johnson, 1982) and of cognitive appraisals of the…”
Career development and counselling for women: Connecting theories to practice (2007, background): “Two other inequities in employment are lack of mentorship (Kittrell, 1998 ; Krakauer & Chen, 2003 ; Phillips & Imhoff, 1997 ) and sexual harassment (O’Connell & Korabik, 2000 ; Phillips & Imhoff, 1997 ).”
Sexual harassment in work organizations: A view from the 21st century. (2018, background): “Others contemplate more complete forms of withdrawal—quitting their jobs altogether (e.g., O’Connell & Korabik, 2000; Schneider et al., 1997; Shupe, Cortina, Ramos, Fitzgerald, & Salisbury, 2002).”
An overview of the literature on antecedents, perceptions and behavioural consequences of sexual harassment (2012, background): “The differences seem to lie in who perpetrates sexual harassment in either workplace (Lach & Gwartney-Gibbs, 1993 ; O'Connell & Korabik, 2000 ), and it appears that in female-dominated professions the harassment seems more likely to come from supervisors (European Commission, 1998 ).”