Cooperative Learning in Dutch Primary Classrooms
By Simon Veenman, Brenda Kenter, Kiki Post. 2000
113 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/149424f9172d572efa3e4582362fb64617667190
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Charlotte Dignath
- G. Büttner
- A. Aelterman
- Hilde Van Keer
- M. Mascolo
- Ernesto Panadero
- M. Veenman
- B. Zimmerman
In Education
Citations in the corpus
- Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level (2008, background): “(2000) observed that teachers devoted only little time to the instruction of cooperative skills, and the implementation of cooperative learning did not meet the characteristics recommended in the literature about effective cooperative learning (Veenman et al. 2000).”
- Project-based learning in primary schools: effects on pupils' learning and attitudes (2011, background): “In research conducted in Dutch primary schools by Veenman, Kenter, and Post ( 2000 ) about teachers' use and evaluation of co-operative learning along with pupils' reactions to co-operative learning, it was claimed that pupils reported a positive attitude towards co-operative learning and rated thei”
- Examining pre-service teacher competence in lesson planning pertaining to collaborative learning (2012, background): “In the context of CL implementation, the importance of careful lesson preparations is recently emphasized (Gillies and Boyle 2010), for the implementation of CL ‘is not simply placing pupils in groups and telling them to work together’ (Veenman et al. 2000: 293).”
- Beyond Student-Centered and Teacher-Centered Pedagogy: Teaching and Learning as Guided Participation (2009, background): “Vygotsky (1978) referred to the distance between these two levels as the zone of proximal development.”