Firm Resources, Quality Signals and The Determinants of Corporate Environmental Reputation: Some UK Evidence

By Steve Toms. 2002

521 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/147646607b545510379301a4d6ed0c508ce86dce

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from the US Banking Sector (2013, unknown): “We use banks’ annual reports, rather than CSR or corporate sustainability reports, because annual reports are the key documents scrutinised by a wide range of stakeholders (e.g. Toms 2002; Campbell and Slack 2008).”
The Determinants Of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence From China (2013, background): “A number of studies show that it is difficult for firms investing in CSR activities to maximize their reputation without disclosing information of such activities (Hasseldine, Salama and Toms, 2005; Toms, 2002).”
Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure in Developed and Developing Countries: A Literature Review (2017, result): “…for example, regulators (Neu et al., 1998; Cormier & Magnan, 1999; Chih et al., 2010; Shi et al., 2012), shareholders (Neu et al. , 1998; Toms, 2002; Thorne et al., 2014), creditors (Roberts, 1992; Oh et al., 2011), investors (Wilmshurst & Frost, 2000), environ-mentalists (Deegan &…”
Quantity versus Quality: The Impact of Environmental Disclosures on the Reputations of UK Plcs (2005, methodology): “Empirical tests of the Toms (2002) framework suggested a positive relationship between disclosure and performance measured by reputation outcome, with mediating variables such as firm size, industry grouping, systematic risk, and diverse institutional share ownership also promoting environmental…”
Social responsibility disclosure in Islamic banks: a comparative study of Indonesia and Malaysia (2017, background): “This leaves no shadow of doubt as to why many practitioners and researchers consider CSR reporting both as part and outcome of reputation risk management (e.g., Friedman and Miles, 2001; Hasseldine, Salama and Toms, 2005; KPMG, 2005; Rayner, 2001; Starovic, 2002; Toms, 2002).”
Corporate Social Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives (2006, methodology): “Toms (2002) used a sample of large listed UK firms included in the UK survey of ‘‘Most Admired Firms’’ for 1996 or 1997.”
Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility: A Comparative Analysis of the UK and the Us (2006, unknown): “Some companies are turning to auditing firms to provide independent verification of the accuracy of their social and environmental disclosure, so the quality and rigor of this information may improve over time (Toms, 2002).”
The Value Relevance of Reputation for Sustainability Leadership (2014, background): “…useful in the understanding of the importance of information on the CSP of a company to investors, both in the case of information disclosed by the firm itself (Hasseldine et al. 2005; Magness 2009; Toms 2002) and in the case of information provided by external parties (Hussainey and Salama 2010).”