Assessing Students' Critical Thinking Performance: Urging for Measurements Using Multi-Response Format.

By Kelly Yee Lai Ku. 2009

476 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/13e65e4889e51e4696a2a24963bb8bd40b9931b9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Education

Citations in the corpus

The Relationship between Iranian EFL Teachers' Critical Thinking Ability and their Professional Success (2010, background): “Students must go beyond absorbing knowledge and learn to heighten skills to judge information, evaluate alternative evidence and argue with tenable reasons (Ku, 2009).”
Pedagogy for Developing Critical Thinking in Adolescents: Explicit Instruction Produces Greatest Gains. (2011, methodology): “A psychometric analysis of the Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment in both Chinese and English language versions was recently published by Ku (2010).”
The development and psychometric validation of a Critical Thinking Disposition Scale (2013, background): “Theorists within the field have lamented this limited attention given to the measurement of thinking dispositions (Edman, 2009; Ennis, 2003; Halpern, 2003; Ku, 2009; Norris, 2003).”
How Are The Physics Critical Thinking Skills of The Students Taught by Using Inquiry-Discovery Through Empirical and Theorethical Overview? (2017, background): “Critical thinking skill is a superior ability which plays an important role in all aspects of human life (Abed et al, 2015), problem solving (Hendricson et al, 2006; Carter et al, 2016) and decision making (Ku, 2009).”
A Conceptual Analysis of Perspective Taking in Support of Socioscientific Reasoning (2019, methodology): “47 foundation for measures of critical thinking, as the dispositions and abilities he identified together formed the basis for operationalization of the concept and evaluation of existing assessment tools (Ennis, 1993; Facione, 2000; Ku, 2009).”
Assessing Critical Thinking in Higher Education: Current State and Directions for Next-Generation Assessment. Research Report. ETS RR-14-10. (2014, background): “In a review of the psychometric quality of existing critical thinking assessments, Ku (2009) reported a phenomenon that the studies conducted by researchers not affiliated with the authors of the tests tend to report lower psychometric quality of the tests than the studies conducted by the authors…”
Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment Predicts Real-World Outcomes of Critical Thinking (2012, background): “There is a great deal of content validity evidence for the HCTA including support for the factor structure, a general critical thinking factor, and the separability of the recognition and recall facets of the assessment (Halpern, 2010a; Hau et al., 2006; Ku, 2009; Ku et al., 2006).”
The Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment and real-world outcomes: Cross-national applications (2012, background): “…to assess critical thinking, the potential raised by the HCTA’s format – which considers both behavioral and motivational components of critical thinking, combines open and multiple-choice questions, and appeals to daily easy-to-relate-to situations (Ku, 2009) – gains even more relevance.”