Assessing Critical Thinking in Higher Education: Current State and Directions for Next-Generation Assessment. Research Report. ETS RR-14-10.

312 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Assessing critical thinking in higher education: the HEIghten™ approach and preliminary validity evidence (2016, methodology): “In the exploration of a theoretical foundation for the HEIghten critical thinking assessment, Liu, Frankel, and Roohr (2014) conducted a comprehensive review of existing literature on critical thinking and summarised definitions from various organisations (e.g. AAC&U’s Valid Assessment of Learning…”
Using Critical Thinking Teaching Methods to Increase Student Success: An Action Research Project. (2017, background): “While no universal definition of critical thinking has been identified, Liu, Frankel, and Roohr (2014) evaluated seven critical thinking frameworks to identify common elements.”
Learning outcomes and critical thinking – good intentions in conflict (2018, background): “There are indeed a number of tests of critical thinking skills, as reviewed by Dumitru et al. (2018) as well as Liu, Frankel, and Roohr (2014), so that particular issue might be handled, depending on institutional policy and teachers’ competence, including their stance on psychometrics.”