Consumers’ Trust in Feelings as Information
By T. Avnet, Michel Tuan Pham, Andrew T. Stephen. 2012
112 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/13a8ba658cafdb6a5b9c4e4227d40b63a8335115
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Dezhi Yin
- Han Zhang
- M. Amin
- Andrew T. Stephen
- Samuel D. Bond
- Sajad Rezaei
- Leonard Lee
- Wan Khairuzzaman Wan Ismail
Citations in the corpus
- Feeling the Future: The Emotional Oracle Effect (2012, methodology): “Recent studies further suggest that the TFM does not induce different moods, different levels of task involvement, different levels of confidence about task performance, or different levels of self-awareness across conditions (Avnet et al. 2012).”
- Uncertainty Increases the Reliance on Affect in Decisions (2017, unknown): “In addition, individuals who have higher trust in their feelings are more likely to rely on their feelings in judgments (Avnet, Pham, and Stephen 2012).”
- Content and process priming: A review ☆ (2014, unknown): “Avnet, Pham, and Stephen (2012) show that people who trust their feelings are more likely to use affect-as-information.”
- Online repatronage intention: an empirical study among Malaysian experienced online shoppers (2014, background): “Most studies of TRT in online business models have tended to focus on TRT as an antecedent to initial web usage or acceptance (Avnet et al., 2012), and dedicated modest attention in continued usage paradigm (Wang and Chiang, 2009).”
- Affect as a Decision-Making System of the Present (2013, unknown): “In the “first” study, participants’ mood states were manipulated as in Avnet, Pham, and Stephen (2012, study 6).”
- Keep Your Cool or Let it Out: Nonlinear Effects of Expressed Arousal on Perceptions of Consumer Reviews (2017, background): “Moreover, consumers differ in the extent to which they view affective experience as detrimental or beneficial to rational judgment (Avnet, Pham, and Stephen 2012; Epstein 1994; Hsee et al. 2003; Isen 2001).”