Psychological Ownership and the Organizational Context: Theory, Research Evidence, and Application

By J. L. Pierce, Iiro Jussila. 2011

252 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/10c04a0b94a11cecee92b6f2bc0e5dc3e0184947

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

The Needs-Affordances-Features Perspective for the Use of Social Media (2018, unknown): “…our possessions (e.g., house, auto-mobile, certificates, awards, pictures, etc.) that function as symbols of our identity and express who we are (e.g., social class, social affiliations, group membership, education, achievements, personal values) to others (Dittmar 1992; Pierce and Jussila 2011).”
Domo Arigato Mr. Roboto (2017, background): “It is the attributes of the target (i.e., the service setting) that can create a sense of psychological ownership on the part of an individual consumer (Pierce and Jussila 2011).”
Psychological Ownership Motivation and Use of Social Media (2015, unknown): “Pierce and Jussila (2011) suggest that the motivation for psychological ownership is, in part, grounded in satisfying the needs underlying psychological ownership.”
Preferences for car sharing services: Effects of instrumental attributes and psychological ownership (2017, background): “Obtaining a target object provides a mechanism through which to fulfil this need (Pierce & Jussila, 2011).”
“As if It Were Mine”: Imagery Works by Inducing Psychological Ownership (2015, unknown): “The link between imagery and psychological ownership would need to be forged based on a very fleeting cognitive engagement (for scepticism about that possibility, see Pierce and Jussila, 2011).”
I’m Proud of It: Consumer Technology Appropriation and Psychological Ownership (2015, unknown): “In addition, it is experienced more intensely when the target activates self-identity, enhances a sense of efficacy, provides stimulation, or facilitates having a place or feeling at home (Pierce and Jussila, 2011).”
Organizational innovation climate and individual innovative behavior: exploring the moderating effects of psychological ownership and psychological empowerment (2017, background): “And these feelings of possession or ownership create a bond between the individual and their organization (Belk1988; Dittmar 1992), and they have become psychologically tied to their organization (Pierce et al. 2004; Pierce and Jussila 2011).”
Linking Tolerance to Workplace Incivility, Service Innovative, Knowledge Hiding, and Job Search Behavior: The Mediating Role of Employee Cynicism (2018, background): “Ownership can be conceptualized as both an objective and a psychological state (Pierce & Jussila, 2011).”
I Own, So I Help Out: How Psychological Ownership Increases Prosocial Behavior (2020, background): “First, our studies were limited to the cultural context of the United States; caveats about potential cultural differences should be considered, especially since, thus far, scholars have focused primarily on psychological ownership in Western cultures (Pierce and Jussila 2011).”
Territoriality, task performance, and workplace deviance: Empirical evidence on role of knowledge hiding (2019, background): “Such a feeling of ownership, especially over intangible objects, results in high level of uncertainty and ambiguity, as there is a risk that others could claim ownership too (Pierce & Jussila, 2011).”
Individual Psychological Ownership: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications for Research in Marketing (2015, unknown): “Furthermore, Pierce and Jussila (2011) reason that because the self has become intertwined with the target to which ownership is felt (and is becoming an important part of the sense of self), the individual will be motivated to engage in behaviors to nurture, advance, and protect the target of…”