Victim and peer group responses to different forms of aggression among primary school children

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

“FearNot!”: a computer-based anti-bullying-programme designed to foster peer intervention (2011, background): “1996), the most common response is to ignore what is going on or even to sympathise with the bully rather than with the victim (Tapper and Boulton 2005).”
What Can Be Done About School Bullying? (2010, unknown): “Bullying has been assessed using direct observations (e.g., Craig, Pepler, & Atlas, 2000; Frey et al., 2009; Tapper & Boulton, 2005), teacher ratings (Nabuzoka, 2003), parent reports (Nordhagen, Neilsen, Stigum, & Kohler, 2005), peer nominations (Vaillancourt et al., 2003; Veenstra et al., 2005),…”
School bullying by one or more ways: Does it matter and how do students cope? (2011, background): “Coping with bullying strategies Eighteen questions [derived from Causey & Dubow’s (1992) categories] specifying several ‘approach’ and ‘avoidance’ coping strategies currently used by students to deal with bullying (Fox & Boulton, 2005; Smith et al., 2001; Tapper & Boulton, 2005;).”
Contributions of Personal and Situational Factors to Bystanders' Reactions to School Bullying (2009, background): “Tapper and Boulton (2005) examined whether bystanders’ reactions are different depending on the type of aggression they witness.”