Managerial coaching: A review of the literature

By Marcia S. Hagen. 2012

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0ed7fa400d048dc69d54593dad8c45f3f2f5cfb1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Sewon Kim
2. Marcia S. Hagen
3. Andrea D. Ellinger
4. Adam M. Grant
5. R. Beattie
6. R. Hamlin
7. T. Egan
8. Sharon K. Parker

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Marcia S. Hagen
2. Adam M. Grant
3. Sewon Kim
4. R. Beattie
5. R. Hamlin
6. T. Egan
7. Andrea D. Ellinger
8. N. Bellé

In Social Psychology

1. Sewon Kim
2. Adam M. Grant
3. Andrea D. Ellinger
4. R. Beattie
5. R. Hamlin
6. Marcia S. Hagen
7. T. Egan
8. N. Bellé

Citations in the corpus

• Managerial Coaching (2014, background): “One of the major weaknesses of managerial coaching, as with other forms of coaching, is the lack of empirical evidence (Hagen, 2012) demonstrating the impact this form of coaching has on individual and/or organizational learning and performance.”
• The Efficacy of Executive Coaching in Times of Organisational Change (2014, background): “The four questions were: How confident are you that you can exercise leadership successfully by: (1) Setting a clear direction for teamwork in order to reach organisational goals?”