Mapping cognitions to better understand attitudinal and behavioral responses in appraisal research
By Robert Wright. 2004
96 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0eb1ebd8b81f3e96598062dee6ad1860ce6b71d4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Organizational justice and employee satisfaction in performance appraisal (2011, background): “On the other hand, appraisers were more concerned with strategic issues, describing their most preferred appraisal system as linked to business strategy, challenging, value-adding, with an objective setting process, well planned, compulsory and structured (Wright, 2004).”
- Explaining and Articulating the Fit Construct in Sponsorship (2011, methodology): “…exploratory methodology to discover the cognitive basis for overall fit judgments between a sponsor and object. study 1: tHe Basis OF Fit perceptiOns To find the basis of overall fit judgments, a cognitive mapping technique used in previous research was employed (Loken and Ward 1985; Wright 2004).”
- The mediating role of organizational justice on the relationship between administrative performance appraisal practices and organizational commitment (2014, background): “Finally, this study only examined three types of PA practices for administrative purposes, but other practices, such as documentation or PA interviews (Pettijohn et al. 2001; Milliman et al. 2002; Wright 2004), would also affect employee perceptions of organizational justice.”
- Attracting Generation Y graduates: Organisational attributes, likelihood to apply and sex differences (2007, background): “for detailed reviews of the repertory grid methodology and Wright (2004)”