The Climate for Creativity and Change in Teams

By S. Isaksen, Kenneth J. Lauer. 2002

209 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0df5f30ac2c652d4573e797e66026b80285464bb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. James Moultrie
2. Alasdair R. Young
3. Susanne Tafvelin

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Beatrice van der Heijden
2. James Moultrie
3. Alasdair R. Young
4. Susanne Tafvelin

In Social Psychology

1. Ramudu Bhanugopan
2. Beatrice van der Heijden
3. James Moultrie
4. Alasdair R. Young
5. Susanne Tafvelin

Citations in the corpus

• Exploratory Study of Organizational Creativity in Creative Organizations (2009, methodology): “Together, these factors provide the basis of the ‘creative climate questionnaire’, a 50-question tool, developed by Ekvall, which has been supported by further studies (Isaksen & Lauer, 2002).”
• Toward Understanding the Direct and Indirect Effects of Transformational Leadership on Well-Being (2011, background): “It may also influence the individual processes of learning and creating and levels of motivation and commitment (Isaksen & Lauer, 2002).”
• Managing for Innovation: The Two Faces of Tension in Creative Climates (2010, unknown): “The climate dimensions have been able to discriminate between best- and worst-case work environments (Isaksen et al., 2001), most and least creative teams (Isaksen & Lauer, 2002), and levels of perceived support for innovation (Isaksen & Lauer, 2001).”
• Organizational climate for innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of innovative work behavior (2017, background): “Management needs to ensure that the organizational climate encourages, nurtures, and enhances individual creativity (DiLiello & Houghton, 2006; Hunter, Bedell, & Mumford, 2007; Isaksen & Lauer, 2002).”