Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes

By Oliver Gassmann, Ellen Enkel. 2004

1,200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0c561e02a85b85b1cade5589f7fcf15f53829351

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The Future of Open Innovation (2010, background): “There are three core processes in opening up the innovation process: outside-in, inside-out and coupled (Gassmann and Enkel, 2004).”
Open innovation in the public sector of leading countries (2012, background): “There are three different processes of open innovation ( Gassmann and Enkel, 2004”
How open is innovation (2010, methodology): “Open innovation has been influential and appears to be adopted by many organizations (Chesbrough and Crowther, 2006; Gassmann and Enkel, 2006).”
Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives (2011, background): “One approach for identifying effective open innovation processes is by taking a typology from literature, e.g., the distinction between inbound, outbound and coupled activities (Gassmann and Enkel, 2004 ), and then defining various practices for each of these activities.”
Advancing a Typology of Open Innovation (2010, background): “…and uncertainty (Terwiesch and Xu, 2008), transaction cost economics to examine governance structure (van de Vrande, Lemmens and Vanhaverbeke, 2006), and learning theory to examine absorptive capacity (Gassmann and Enkel, 2004; Laursen and Salter, 2006) and search capability (Kirschbaum 2005).”
Opening science: towards an agenda of open science in academia and industry (2014, background): “periphery (Gassmann and Enkel 2004).”
Shifting intra- and inter-organizational innovation processes towards digital business: An empirical analysis of SMEs (2017, background): “Creative ideas are increasingly generated by merging internal and external sources (Gassmann & Enkel, 2004; Santoro, Ferraris, Giacosa & Giovando, 2016; Scuotto & Shukla, 2015), moving from a centralized and internal R&D method to a decentralized ongoing flow of research activities (Del Giudice,…”