Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives

By Eelko K. R. E. Huizingh. 2011

1,914 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Science Applications, Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bcc207b980f1fbf5d24428a032279479e36645bd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Science Applications

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Open Social Innovation (2015, background): “Further studies on the applicability of open innovation methodologies in various contexts are necessary (Huizingh, 2011); on the other hand, the study of social innovation is also necessary in order to determine what effectively generates innovation in social practices as well as the current…”
Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge–based practices and internal value creation (2018, positive): “For instance, collaborating with large firms provides innovation intermediaries with more economic advantages compared with universities and small firms (Wright et al., 2008; Huizingh, 2011; Howells et al., 2012) due to large firms’ capacity to develop long-term relationships and the size of their r”
Inside the high-tech black box: A critique of technology entrepreneurship policy (2014, background): “Smaller companies in particular “can gain a lot by open innovation as both their resources and market reach are limited” (Huizingh, 2011, p. 5).”
Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance (2019, background): “Moreover, OI repeatedly starts with subcontracting to service firms (Gassmann, Enkel, & Chesbrough, 2010) and it relates to how firms should cooperate with outside parties to boost process and product innovation (Huizingh, 2011).”
Open innovation and company culture: Internal openness makes the difference (2017, background): “…community sense, it can be argued that suppliers are becoming ever more important not only as sources but also contributors to innovation and commercial success (Chiaroni et al., 2011; Dahlandera and Gann, 2010; Harison and Koski, 2009; Huizingh, 2011; Lee et al., 2010; Van den Biesen, 2008).”
Knowledge-based human resource management practices, intellectual capital and innovation (2017, neutral): “Likewise, they also echo earlier studies that emphasized that relationships with extra-firm parties can introduce new knowledge and insights and support novel constellations of ideas and collaborations, as argued by literature on open innovation (e.g. Chesbrough, 2006; Huizingh, 2011).”
Open Innovation 4.0 as an Enhancer of Sustainable Innovation Ecosystems (2020, background): “Most of the criticisms relied on the need for strong clarification about the agents needing to be involved in the process and their role in the development of the actions [37,38]; however, decentralization in governance is the major challenge put forward by this framework [39].”