Determinants of Alliance Portfolio Complexity and Its Effect on Innovative Performance of Companies

By Geert Duysters, Boris Lokshin. 2011

337 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0841f8e3496855d9b3b624be63b281aa9f65a76c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Beating Competitors to International Markets: The Value of Geographically Balanced Networks for Innovation (2014, background): “Third, Duysters and Lokshin (2011) recently concluded that alliance complexity had an inverse Ushaped relationship to innovative performance.”
Returns to alliance portfolio diversity : The relative effects of partner diversity on firm’s innovative performance and productivity (2014, neutral): “No distinction could be made between alliance portfolio size and APD (cf. e.g., Duysters & Lokshin, 2011; Laursen & Salter, 2006; Oerlemans et al., 2013).”
Innovation processes in family firms: the relevance of organizational flexibility (2016, background): “partners can help a company remain innovative (Duysters and Lokshin 2011).”
Knowledge sharing, knowledge leaking and relative innovation performance: An empirical study (2015, background): “, 1997; Huizingh, 2011; Laursen and Salter, 2006), as firms are increasingly acquiring the knowledge which they need to innovate from outside their own boundaries (Duysters and Lokshin, 2011; Spithoven et al., 2010).”
Capturing value from alliance portfolio diversity: The mediating role of R&D human capital in high and low tech industries (2017, background): “However, too much diversity of external sources could Martinez), adversely impact firm innovation performance due to increased organisational and managerial complexity (Duysters and Lokshin, 2011; Bader and Enkel, 2014; Foss et al., 2011).”
Corporate venture capital portfolios and firm innovation (2016, neutral): “…2010; Srivastava and Gnyawali, 2011; Wuyts et al., 2004), others have found support for a non-linear, inverted-U shaped effect (de Leeuw et al., 2014; Duysters and Lokshin, 2011; Luo and Deng, 2009; Van de Vrande, 2013; Vasudeva and Anand, 2011) as well as a U-shaped effect (Wuyts and Dutta, 2012).”
Process innovation in small- and medium-sized enterprises: The critical roles of external knowledge sourcing and absorptive capacity (2020, background): “Simultaneous collaboration with multiple external partners may result in higher marginal costs, especially for small firms (Duysters & Lokshin, 2011).”
Strong Ties as Sources of New Knowledge: How Small Firms Innovate through Bridging Capabilities** (2012, background): “For small firms, the management of a broad and heterogeneous alliance portfolio can be problematic, though, because of limitations in resource availability and management attention (Duysters and Lokshin 2011; Lang, Calantone, and Gudmundson 1997).”
Diversity in Alliance Portfolios and Performance Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis (2017, background): “On the other hand, managing a diverse set of partners likely imposes additional coordination costs (Goerzen & Beamish, 2005) and complexity on the alliance portfolio (Duysters & Lokshin, 2011).”
The Impact of Innovation on the Firm Performance and Corporate Social Responsibility of Vietnamese Manufacturing Firms (2019, background): “[36] also contributed by investigating the synergistic impact of inbound openness on innovation performance.”