Internationalisation of the family business: a longitudinal perspective

By Chris Graves, Jill Thomas. 2004

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06e63792ed91f7b46afb10fc567854db57bd1219

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The Internationalization of Family Firms (2014, background): “Yet evidence on this phenomenon is scarce (Calabrò & Mussolino, 2011; Graves & Thomas, 2004).”
Social capital in relation to the foreign market entry and post-entry operations of family SMEs (2011, background): “As regards social capital, it should be noted that family SMEs are less likely to form networks – that is, bridging social capital ties – with other businesses than are non-family SMEs (Graves and Thomas 2004; Roessl 2005).”
Determinants of the Internationalization Pathways of Family Firms: An Examination of Family Influence (2008, background): “Recent studies (Fernández & Nieto, 2005; Graves & Thomas, 2004) suggest that family businesses face unique barriers to international expansion.”
Internationalization of Australian Family Businesses: A Managerial Capabilities Perspective (2006, background): “Recent studies (Fernández & Nieto, 2005; Graves & Thomas, 2004) suggest that FBs face unique barriers to interna- tional expansion.”
A Socioemotional Wealth Perspective on how Collaboration Intensity, Trust, and International Market Knowledge affect Family Firms' Multinationality (2016, background): “For this reason, family firms have fewer numbers of collaborations compared to nonfamily firms (Graves & Thomas, 2004), participate in fewer alliances with international partners (Kontinen & Ojala, 2011b; Pukall & Calabrò, 2014), and are reluctant to enter new networks with untested partners…”
Chinese Private Firms and Internationalization (2014, background): “Conversely, firms with less family involvement tend to have richer social capital and managerial resources (Graves & Thomas, 2004).”
Network ties in the international opportunity recognition of family SMEs (2011, background): “This can be explained through the limited scope of the networks (Graves & Thomas, 2004) that the family SMEs could utilize for international expansion.”