Pragmatics in Language Teaching: Classroom research on interlanguage pragmatics

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going (2015, background): “Many of these studies have appeared in edited volumes dedicated to instructional studies in L2 pragmatics (e.g., Rose & Kasper 2001; Martı́nez-Flor & Alcón-Soler 2005; Rose 2005; Alcón-Soler & Martı́nez-Flor 2008;)”
Learner Corpus Analysis and the Development of L2 Pragmatic Competence in Networked Inter-cultural Language Study: The Case of German Modal Particles (2005, background): “For some time, researchers have lamented the fact that the majority of reports on L2 pragmatics are comparative rather than acquisitional in scope (e.g., Kasper, 1996, 2001a; Kasper & Schmidt, 1996; see also Ortega & Iberri-Shea, 2005).”
Teaching Pragmatics: Trends and Issues (2011, background): “These studies compared the effects of certain teaching methods over others by measuring the degree of learning from pre- to post-instruction (Kasper, 2001; Kasper & Roever, 2005; Martı́nez-Flor & Alcón-Soler, 2005; Roever, 2009).”
Speech act sets of refusal and complaint: A comparison of native and non-native English-speakers' production (2004, methodology): “In one study, ESL students demonstrated improvement in their performances of complaints and refusals after 3.5 hours of instruction, and continued to maintain their improvement in a post-test given six months after the instruction (Morrow, 1996, as cited in Kasper, 2001).”