Language acquisition and language socialization : ecological perspectives

By Claire J. Kramsch. 2002

440 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0633cc005c2492af66ac9660a883164c81359f94

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes (2016, background): “He agreed that EAP teachers should be politically aware but that a pragmatic approach that would not distract from the business of actually teaching EAP should take priority (1998, p. 314).”
Using conversation analysis in the second language classroom to teach interactional competence (2011, background): “Therefore they are no longer regarded as a machine, a metaphor used for too long in traditional second language acquisition (SLA) where there is input, output, uptake, etc. (Kramsch, 2002).”
Language as a Complex Adaptive System (2000, background): “There is no self-organisation because each agent constructs individually his own repertoire which will only be similar to the extent that the agents are in the same environment and use the same sensori-motor apparatus.”
Japanese Language Proficiency, Social Networking, and Language Use during Study Abroad: Learners' Perspectives (2012, background): “Kramsch (2002), for instance, challenges the ‘learner as computer metaphor’ inherent in cognitive approaches such as Long’s approach (p. 451–452).”
Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics - Introduction to the special issue (2006, background): “The philosophical analysis of dialectics has a rich tradition, flowing from Plato, Socrates, Hegel, Kant, Vygotsky, and Wertsch into applied linguistics in the work of Lantolf, Kramsch and others (Kramsch 2002; Lantolf 2006; Lantolf and Thorne 2006).”
Codemeshing in Academic Writing: Identifying Teachable Strategies of Translanguaging (2011, background): “Because multilinguals cannot expect to be equipped with all of the codes or full proficiency required for a contact situation, they look for alignment to create meaning (Firth & Wagner, 2007; Kramsch, 2002).”
Language Is a Complex Adaptive System: Position Paper (2009, background): “Third, although both L1 and L2 acquisition are sociocognitive processes (Kramsch, 2002; Larsen-Freeman, 2002), because L2 learners are normally more cognitively mature, the social environment/conditions of learning are significantly different from those of a child acquiring an L1.”
Own-language use in language teaching and learning (2012, background): “…to new language development (e.g. LarsenFreeman 1997; Larsen-Freeman & Cameron 2008: 115–160); of SOCIOCULTURAL THEORY (e.g. Lantolf 2000, 2011); and of ECOLOGICAL APPROACHES (e.g. van Lier 2000, 2004; Kramsch 2002) as ways of understanding and explaining language and language-related phenomena.”
Second Language Use, Socialization, and Learning in Internet Interest Communities and Online Gaming (2009, background): “19 Ecological theoretical frameworks for the study of SLA that investigate how parts of a complex system interact have been proposed by Kramsch (2002b), Kramsch and Whiteside (2008), Leather and Van Dam (2003), and van Lier (2004).”
Language learning and study abroad (2018, background): “Thus language learning involves more than the accumulation of competence by individuals; instead, it represents one aspect of becoming a person in society (Ochs 2002).”