Methodological and theoretical issues on psychological traditionality and modernity research in an Asian society: In response to Kwang‐Kuo Hwang and beyond

By Kuo-shu Yang. 2003

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0609d609553f4923298bd5baa10561d5abccf9be

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Luo Lu
2. H. Kwan
3. Kuo-shu Yang
4. Xiongzhi Wang
5. Chaozhi Zhang
6. Long-Zeng Wu
7. Xiangfan Wu
8. Jie Ma

In Sociology and Political Science

1. H. Kwan
2. Long-Zeng Wu
3. Luo Lu
4. Xiongzhi Wang
5. Chaozhi Zhang
6. Xiangfan Wu
7. Jie Ma
8. N. Hiller

Citations in the corpus

• Contingent effects of social norms on tourists’ pro-environmental behaviours: the role of Chinese traditionality (2020, background): “However, Chinese traditionality distinguishes significantly from power distance and collectivism as it is posited as a dispositional factor or trait at the individual rather than societal level (Yang, 2003; Yang et al., 1989).”
• The Effect of Workplace Negative Gossip on Employee Proactive Behavior in China: The Moderating Role of Traditionality (2015, background): “Yang (2003) defines traditionality as the typical patterns of related motivational, evaluative, attitudinal, and temperamental traits that were frequently practiced in traditional Chinese society and can still be observed in contemporary Chinese societies such as Taiwan, Hong Kong, and mainland…”
• Benevolence and authority as WEIRDly unfamiliar: A multi-language meta-analysis of paternalistic leadership behaviors from 152 studies (2019, background): “Even within China, which has been the most studied country context for PL research, the typicality of co-occurrence of both high benevolence and high authority remains unknown.”
• Emergence and composition of the traditional‐modern bicultural self of people in contemporary Taiwanese societies (2006, background): “…to the Chinese bicultural self Early research in the 1980s and ’90s centred on the value and attitude changes for the Chinese people during modernization, reviewed by Yang (1986, 2003), more recent endeavours have attempted to analyze the nature and functioning of the Chinese bicultural self.”