One More Reason Not to Cut Your Training Budget: The Relationship between Training and Organizational Outcomes
By P. Owens. 2006
169 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/05f529a974b7e3e0185781f7f5011a9d4b2d2a1b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Alexander Newman
- Wendy Hui
- Scott Brum
- C. S. Long
- R. Peccei
- Chandranshu Sinha
- Rani Thanacoody
- Nouruddeen Bashir
Citations in the corpus
- The impact of employee perceptions of training on organizational commitment and turnover intentions: a study of multinationals in the Chinese service sector (2011, background): “Recent literature has begun to examine the relationship between training and commitment (Owens, 2006; Al-Emadi and Marquardt, 2007).”
- The relationship between training and organizational commitment among academicians in Malaysia (2015, background): “between training and organisational commitment (Tannenbaum et al., 1991; Bartlett, 2001; Owens, 2006; Al-Emadi and Marquardt, 2007).”
- FACTORS AFFECTING QUALITY OF WORK LIFE: Empirical Evidence From Indian Organizations (2012, methodology): “The second section was supplemented by items based on the studies of Kings (1992); Aduan Che Rose et al. (2006); Owens (2006); Lapierre & Allen, (2006); Desrochers, Hilton, & Larwood, (2005); Thompson, Beauvais, & Lyness, (1999); Mishra and Gupta (2009); Wanous, Reichers & Austin, (2000);…”
- WHAT IMPACT DOES TRAINING HAVE ON EMPLOYEE COMMITMENT AND EMPLOYEE TURNOVER (2007, background): “Patrick Owens (2006) had a similar finding in his study of training and organizational outcomes.”
- Trainees' reactions to training: an analysis of the factors affecting overall satisfaction with training (2009, background): “In other words, training is a key human resource practice and, as such, clearly deserves and requires systematic monitoring and evaluation (Rebora 2005; Owens 2006).”