Teachers' Gender Stereotypes as Determinants of Teacher Perceptions in Elementary School Mathematics
By Joachim Tiedemann. 2002
211 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/05f2c1587229b7ff55cd81165516a6ed7ba6ecfe
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
- Michela Carlana
- Clarissa J. Arms-Chavez
- Ana B. Arêas da Luz Fontes
- Penelope Espinoza
- Luis A. Leyva
- Camille Terrier
- Anna Lusardi
- L. Bottazzi
In Sociology and Political Science
- Michela Carlana
- Miriam Nürnberger
- Clarissa J. Arms-Chavez
- Ana B. Arêas da Luz Fontes
- Josef Nerb
- Stefan Sütterlin
- Hilda Borko
- Johannes Keller
Citations in the corpus
- Attributional gender bias: teachers’ ability and effort explanations for students’ math performance (2014, background): “The teacher’s explanations may vary depending on the student’s gender, ethnicity, social class, past performance, or the nature of the behavior (Fennema et al. 1990; Tiedemann 2002; Tom and Cooper 1986).”
- Implicit Gender Stereotypes and Essentialist Beliefs Predict Preservice Teachers’ Tracking Recommendations (2016, background): “…to 5 (deficient) and also offering intermediate ratings (e.g., 3.5) according to their perceived match to school grades.3 Considering findings by Tiedemann (2000, 2002) showing that a gender bias becomes especially pronounced for average-achieving students, we constructed eight ambiguous…”
- Unpacking the Male Superiority Myth and Masculinization of Mathematics at the Intersections: A Review of Research on Gender in Mathematics Education (2017, background): “…of Mathematics teacher–student interactions, teacher beliefs of students’ mathematical ability, and students’ engagement with activities and instruction (Becker, 1981; Boaler, 1997; Fennema, Peterson, Carpenter, & Lubinski, 1990; Hart, 1989; Peterson & Fennema, 1985; Tiedemann, 2000, 2002).”
- Mathematical thinking of kindergarten boys and girls: similar achievement, different contributing processes (2010, background): “Teacher–child interactions may reflect differential socialization processes for boys and girls ( Joachim, 2002; Marsh, Martin, & Cheng, 2008).”
- Implicit Stereotypes: Evidence from Teachers’ Gender Bias* (2019, background): “It has been shown that they believe math is more difficult for girls than equally achieving boys (Riegle-Crumb and Humphries, 2012; Tiedemann, 2002).46 Furthermore, Sadker and Sadker (2010) document that teachers spend more time interacting with boys, while Hyde et al. (1990) suggests that math is…”
- Classroom Assessment Practices, Teacher Judgments, and Student Achievement in Mathematics: Evidence from the ECLS (2009, background): “…may vary for groups of students with different backgrounds or characteristics such as ethnicity (Darling-Hammond, 1995), gifted status (Gear, 1976), disability status (Martínez & Mastergeorge, 2002), gender (Tiedemann, 2002), or classroom conduct (Bennett, Gottesman, Rock, & Cerullo, 1993).”