Enhancing Creative Performance: Effects of Expected Developmental Assessment Strategies and Creative Personality

By Jing Zhou, Greg R. Oldham. 2001

266 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/05b267606095d39059ffc23854b42fa7143af252

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Innovative work behavior and personality traits: Examining the moderating effects of organizational tenure (2017, background): “For example, job characteristics have been found to influence IWB (Baer & Oldham, 2006; Zhou & Oldham, 2001).”
Age and creativity at work The interplay between job resources, age and idea creativity (2008, methodology): “As recommended by Zhou and Oldham (2001) only the rating of overall creativity was used as a measure of the creative outcome.”
Factors Influencing Individual Creativity in the Workplace: An Examination of Quantitative Empirical Research (2005, methodology): “Zhou and Oldham (2001) also used the CPS and found that individuals with more creative personalities had more creative outcomes.”
The influence of leader regulatory focus on employee creativity (2008, background): “…shown that employees demonstrate higher levels of creativity when leaders give informational and developmental evaluation and feedback (Zhou, 1998; Zhou and Oldham, 2001), provide encouragement (Frese et al., 1999), avoid close monitoring (George and Zhou, 2001; Zhou, 2003), develop quality…”
The impact of feedback from job and task autonomy in the relationship between dispositional resistance to change and innovative work behaviour (2013, background): “For example, Zhou and Oldham (2001) indicated that people who were high on creative personality and perceived a developmental appraisal on their work reported the highest levels of creative performance.”
The Effects of Personal and Contextual Characteristics on Creativity: Where Should We Go from Here? (2004, methodology): “Similarly,Zhou and Oldham (2001)showed that individuals who were high on CPS and expected a developmental assessment of their work had the highest creativity.”
Psychological capital as a mediator of the relationship between leadership and creative performance behaviors: empirical evidence from the Indian R&D sector (2014, background): “Given the intuitive appeal of this assertion, there is a surprising dearth of evidence on the possible mediating role of subordinate reactions in the leadership–creativity relationship and the absence of holistic views on how the patterns of leadership behavior might affect an employee’s creativity ”
Differential Effects of Expected External Evaluation on Different Parts of the Creative Idea Production Process and on Final Product Creativity (2008, background): “A factor that has received growing attention in this literature is expected external evaluation (e.g., Amabile, 1979; Shalley, 1995; Zhou & Oldham, 2001).”
Taking personal initiative and communicating about ideas: What is important for the creative process and for idea creativity? (2007, methodology): “Following Zhou and Oldham (2001), only the rating of overall creativity was used as a measure of the creative outcome.”