Infants' Differential Processing of Female and Male Faces

By Jennifer L. Ramsey-Rennels, J. Langlois. 2006

94 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/71bfc385f52f90807dfb10024ae29badba44795b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. A. Loven
2. A. Herlitz
3. Johanna Lovén

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. A. Loven
2. A. Herlitz
3. Johanna Lovén

In Sociology and Political Science

1. A. Loven
2. A. Herlitz
3. Johanna Lovén

Citations in the corpus

• Sex differences and the own-gender bias in face recognition: A meta-analytic review (2013, background): “In contrast, infant boys’ early advantage for female faces may be attenuated later during development, as boys may become more oriented towards other males, which could weaken their original skill for female faces and strengthen their skill for male faces (Ramsey-Rennels & Langlois, 2006).”
• Sex Differences in Cognitive Functions (2009, background): “Boys’ advantage for female faces may be weakened in childhood due to a greater interest in males and male faces (Ramsey-Rennels & Langlois, 2006), which could explain the inconsistent pattern found in boys’ and men’s memory for female and male faces.”
• Sex Differences in Episodic Memory (2008, background): “Moreover, developmentally, categorization of female faces precedes that of male faces for both sexes, possibly as a result of greater early exposure to female than to male faces (Ramsey-Rennels & Langlois, 2006).”