The Cognitive Basis of Science: The cognitive basis of model-based reasoning in science
By Nancy J. Nersessian. 2002
292 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/05558d8493740d5b65958bd6409c83dbf4b6ac68
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Christian D. Schunn
- Cory D. Wright
- Bo T. Christensen
- Kevin Dunbar
- Keith J. Holyoak
- David Klahr
- Robert G. Morrison
- William Bechtel
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Bo T. Christensen
- Kevin Dunbar
- J. Haynie
- Christian D. Schunn
- Keith J. Holyoak
- David Klahr
- Robert G. Morrison
- William Bechtel
In History and Philosophy of Science
- Cory D. Wright
- Bo T. Christensen
- Kevin Dunbar
- Christian D. Schunn
- Keith J. Holyoak
- David Klahr
- Robert G. Morrison
- William Bechtel
Citations in the corpus
- Knowledge Recombination Across Technological Boundaries: Scientists vs. Engineers (2013, background): “Because of the contextual embeddedness of distant technological knowledge (Nonaka 1994), an important part of this meta-learning ability is the skill to characterize phenomena in general forms and to abstract from the complexity of particular objects or systems (Nersessian 2002).”
- Making it personal: : Opportunity individuation and the shaping of opportunity beliefs (2014, background): “…suggests that motivation to evaluate the opportunity (Hamilton et al., 1980; Shane et al., 2003), experience with prior entrepreneurial failure (Nersessian, 2002; Walsh and Bartunek, 2011), and the entrepreneur's fear of failure (Atkinson, 1957; Mitchell and Shepherd, 2010) are individual…”
- The role and impact of mental simulation in design (2009, background): “Here (following Nersessian, 2002, p. 143 ), we minimally hypothesize that humans reason by constructing a mental model of the situations, events and processes in WM that in dynamic cases can be manipulated through simulation.”
- The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (2012, background): “This “radical conceptual change” process (see Keil, 1999; Nersessian 1998, 2002; Thagard, 1992; Vosniadou 1998, for reviews) requires the formation of a new conceptual Page 18 of 52 Scientific Thinking and Reasoning PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com).”
- Visual and Spatial Modes in Science Learning (2009, background): “Visual‐mental models do figure prominently in cases of conceptual change across the sciences (Nersessian, 2002 ).”
- Scientific Thinking and Reasoning (2012, background): “16; Nersessian, 2002 ; Thagard, 1992).”
- Mechanisms and psychological explanation (2007, background): “There is related work by philosophers (Nersessian, 1999, 2002) and psychologists (Ippolito & Tweney, 1995) on simulating experiments which may be useful to developing a more robust account of how cognitive agents come to understand the relation between the components of a mechanism and what it does.”
- Modeling as a teaching learning process for understanding materials: A case study in primary education (2007, background): “Both those in philosophy of science (Giere, 1988, 1997; Nersessian, 2002) and science education from American and European traditions (Clement, 2000; Duschl, 2000; Duschl &”