Kevin Dunbar

Developmental and Educational Psychology · 1995–2014

A researcher in the Science corpus: 8 papers; trusts 22 researchers and is trusted by 8 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Developmental and Educational Psychology — 22 citations into it; #6,315 of 8,223 by trust here, #7,501 by citations
• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 17 citations into it
• Cognitive Science & Psychology — 8 citations into it
• Education — 8 citations into it; #5,278 of 11,309 by trust here, #7,537 by citations
• Artificial Intelligence — 7 citations into it; #25,601 of 35,345 by trust here, #30,347 by citations
• History and Philosophy of Science — 6 citations into it
• Cognitive Neuroscience — 5 citations into it; #3,860 of 10,852 by trust here, #8,086 by citations
• Social Psychology — 5 citations into it

Whom Kevin Dunbar trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. K. Anders Ericsson
2. Keith J. Holyoak
3. Paul J Silvia
4. J. Baron
5. Michelene T. H. Chi
6. Mark A. Runco
7. Lucy Suchman
8. Selcuk Acar
9. Paul Thagard
10. Mary Gick

Who trusts Kevin Dunbar overall

1. Dedre Gentner
2. Dennis R. Brophy
3. Bo T. Christensen
4. Denis G. Dumas
5. Ozgur Ozkan
6. Clark A. Chinn
7. Michael D. Mumford
8. Melissa A. Schilling
9. Keith J. Holyoak
10. Stefan Wiltschnig

Papers from Kevin Dunbar's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Kevin Dunbar trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. HOW SCIENTISTS REALLY REASON: SCIENTIFIC REASONING IN REAL-WORLD LABORATORIES
2. THE PROCESSES AND CHALLENGES OF CONCEPTUAL CHANGE
3. How scientists explain disease
4. Can We Trust Creativity Tests? A Review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT)
5. Analogical problem solving
6. BGuILE: Stragtegic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms
7. Exploring Science: The Cognition and Development of Discovery Processes (J. Documentation)
8. The analogical paradox: Why analogy is so easy in naturalistic settings yet so difficult in the psychological laboratory.
9. The Standard Definition of Creativity
10. Thinking and deciding, 4th ed.

Their papers

• Understanding Fluency and Originality: A latent variable perspective (2014) — 147 citations
• The Nature and Development of Critical-Analytic Thinking (2014) — 104 citations
• Scientific Thinking and Reasoning (2012) — 196 citations
• Do Naïve Theories Ever Go Away? Using Brain and Behavior to Understand Changes in Concepts (2007) — 92 citations
• The analogical paradox: Why analogy is so easy in naturalistic settings yet so difficult in the psychological laboratory. (2001) — 186 citations
• How Scientists Think in the Real World: Implications for Science Education (2000) — 171 citations
• What Scientific Thinking Reveals About the Nature of Cognition (2000) — 111 citations
• HOW SCIENTISTS REALLY REASON: SCIENTIFIC REASONING IN REAL-WORLD LABORATORIES (1995)