REEXAMINING THE ROLE OF RECASTS IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION

By R. Ellis, Younghee Sheen. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2006

367 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/051e6de1d10f94210cf416b30cca50648a8ba446

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Language and Linguistics

In Literature and Literary Theory

Citations in the corpus

CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND WORKING MEMORY CAPACITY IN INTERACTION-DRIVEN L2 LEARNING (2012, background): “…second language (L2) learning has been one of the most hotly debated topics in interaction research and, as such, has been at the center of controversy and scholarly discussion (see Ellis & Sheen, 2006 ; Long, 2007 ; Nicholas, Lightbown, & Spada, 2001 , for relevant issues and research fi ndings).”
Raising language awareness in peer interaction: a cross-context, cross-methodology examination (2012, background): “Although there exists a range of CF explicitness (see Egi, 2007 ; Ellis & Sheen, 2006 ; Iwashita, 2003 ; Leeman, 2003 ; Nicholas, Lightbown, & Spada, 2001 ; Philp, 2003 ; Sato, 2011 ; Sheen, 2006 ), students were simply taught either to let their partners know that there was an error (prompt”
Effects of Form-Focused Instruction and Corrective Feedback on L2 Pronunciation Development of /ɹ/ by Japanese Learners of English (2012, background): “…to focusing more on communication, because such recasts might appear to be identical or alternative ways of saying the same thing in order to confirm message comprehensibility or veracity (Ellis & Sheen, 2006; Lyster, 1998b, 2007; Lyster & Saito, 2010a; Nicholas, Lightbown, & Spada, 2001).”
Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms (2012, background): “…1998), but research has shown that, depending on their context and characteristics – such as linguistic targets, length, and number of changes made to the original utterance – they can also be quite explicit (Nicholas, Lightbown & Spada 2001; Sheen 2004, 2006; Ellis & Sheen 2006; Sato 2011).”
INTERPRETING RECASTS AS LINGUISTIC EVIDENCE: The Roles of Linguistic Target, Length, and Degree of Change (2007, background): “…First, despite their label, recasts can be quite explicit, depending on their characteristics, including linguistic targets, length, and number of changes ~Ellis & Sheen, 2006; Nicholas et al+!+ Second, the classification scheme imposed by researchers might not necessarily coincide with the…”
TASK COMPLEXITY, FOCUS ON FORM, AND SECOND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT (2009, background): “The results of existing empirical studies suggest that recasts can indeed have a benefi cial impact on SLA (Mackey & Goo, 2007 ), but the degree to which they do depends on several factors (Ellis & Sheen, 2006 ; Long, 2007 ).”
EFFECTS OF FORM-FOCUSED PRACTICE AND FEEDBACK ON CHINESE EFL LEARNERS’ ACQUISITION OF REGULAR AND IRREGULAR PAST TENSE FORMS (2010, background): “The saliency of recasts can also be enhanced by input features relating to shortness in length, minimal changes, and intonational stress (Egi, 2007 a; Ellis & Sheen, 2006 ; Loewen & Philp, 2006 ; Nicholas et al.; Sheen, 2006 ).”
ORAL FEEDBACK IN CLASSROOM SLA (2010, background): “Previous review articles (Ellis & Sheen, 2006 ; Nicholas, Lightbown, & Spada, 2001 ; Spada, 1997 ; Spada & Lightbown, 2009 ) pointed out that the effectiveness of CF and subsequent learning outcomes are notably different in laboratory and classroom settings, and the meta-analysis of interaction…”
Anniversary article Interactional feedback in second language teaching and learning: A synthesis and analysis of current research (2016, background): “The findings of this research, which have been reported in many individual studies and in a number of reviews and meta-analyses (e.g. Ellis & Sheen, 2006; Goo & Mackey, 2013; Li, 2010; Lyster & Ranta, 2013; Lyster & Saito, 2010; Lyster, Saito, & Sato, 2012; Mackey & Goo, 2007; Nassaji, 2015, 2016;…”
DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF ORAL AND WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN THE ESL CLASSROOM (2010, background): “Additionally, Nicholas, Lightbown, and Spada ( 2001 ), Long ( 2007 ), and Ellis and Sheen ( 2006 ) have provided reviews of the research on one type of CF—recasts (see also Mackey, 2007 ).”