Special Issue on Design and Development: Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature

By Viswanathan Krishnan, Karl T. Ulrich. Management Sciences, 2001

635 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/04bb6332381499e26146dc5e5b409dde3830a5e6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

An integrated rough number-based approach to design concept evaluation under subjective environments (2013, background): “NPD includes a series of critical decision-making processes (Krishnan and Ulrich 2001).”
Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Challenges and Recommendations of Literature Search in Information Systems Research (2015, background): “Fjermestad and Hiltz (1998) analyzed 200 studies in their review of experimental research on group support systems, and Melville et al. (2004) and Krishnan and Ulrich (2001) each collected and analyzed around 200 publications for their literature reviews on IT business value and product development…”
Exchanging Preliminary Information in Concurrent Engineering: Alternative Coordination Strategies (2002, unknown): “Concurrent engineering, the practice of executing coupled development activities in parallel, has become the common mode of product development as time-to-market has gained in importance over the last 15 years (Takeuchi and Nonaka 1986, Wheelwright and Clark 1992, Krishnan and Ulrich 2001).”
The Role of Inclusive Innovation in Promoting Social Sustainability (2019, background): “Krishnan and Ulrich (2001) define the operations of product/service innovation as a sequence of steps and phases with the performance metric of efficiency (Thomke and Bell 2001).”
The Transformation of the Innovation Process: How Digital Tools are Changing Work, Collaboration, and Organizations in New Product Development* (2020, unknown): “The process perspective allows researchers to investigate the activities and interactions that are required for the successful generation and introduction of an innovation (Greve and Taylor, 2000; Griffin, 1997; Krishnan and Ulrich, 2001).”
New service development: areas for exploitation and exploration (2002, unknown): “This challenge is particularly difficult given the diverse literature reporting NPD research (see Krishnan and Ulrich, 2001; Wind and Mahajan, 1997; Brown and Eisenhardt, 1995).”
Solving the multiple platforms configuration problem (2009, unknown): “Thus, the importance of the production platform approach offers the advantage of developing several variants from a unified platform with a considerable cost savings.”
Innovation processes: Which process for which project? (2015, background): “Nevertheless, as noted by Krishnan and Ulrich (2001), the various approaches to product development management typically focus on a single theme or area (primarily on marketing, organization, engineering projects, and operations management) and do not discuss the relationships among these themes or…”
Linking Marketing and Engineering Product Design Decisions via Analytical Target Cascading (2005, unknown): “in engineering design in terms of product representation and choice of performance and success metrics (Krishnan and Ulrich, 2001).”
Enhancing Marketing with Engineering: Optimal Product Line Design for Heterogeneous Markets (2011, unknown): “Because the scopes, perspectives, modeling methods, and objectives differ substantially among product development disciplines (Krishnan & Ulrich, 2001 provide a detailed overview), it is inevitable that some conflicts of terminology will exist.”
Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas over Time: An Analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm Community (2013, background): “The need for innovation is consistently a top business priority among CEOs (Andrew et al. 2010, Jaruzelski and Dehoff 2010) and a key issue in academic research (Krishnan and Ulrich 2001, Hauser et al. 2006).”
All You Need Is Trust? An Examination of Inter‐organizational Supply Chain Projects (2015, methodology): “The calculated value of 3.23 for our model is well below the critical threshold value of 10 for this criterion.”
New Product Development as a Complex Adaptive System of Decisions (2006, unknown): “…stage, such decisions could result in geometric models of assemblies and components, a bill of materials, and control documentation for production (Krishnan and Ulrich, 2001), whereas the testing and validation stage might deal with the cost of prototyping, the method of prototyping to be used,…”