Characterizing the gender gap in introductory physics

By Lauren E. Kost, S. Pollock, Noah Finkelstein. 2009

208 citations recorded by the source corpus.

of males and females. Males and females have significantly different prior understandings of physics and mathematics. Females are less likely to take high school physics than males, although they are equally likely to take high school calculus. Males and females also differ in their incoming attitudes and beliefs about physics. This collection of background factors is analyzed to determine the extent to which each factor correlates with performance on a conceptual post-test and with gender. Binned by quintiles, we observe that males and females with similar pretest scores do not have significantly different post-test scores p0.2. The post-test data are then modeled using two regression models multiple regression and logistic regression to estimate the gender gap in post-test scores after controlling for these important prior factors. These prior factors account for about 70% of the observed gender gap. The results indicate that the gender gap exists in interactive physics classes at our institution but is largely associated with differences in previous physics and math knowledge and incoming attitudes and beliefs.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/040dfa7106d70640ce8cc437fcc10b26d98353ad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

  1. Jennifer Docktor
  2. Jose P. Mestre
  3. Noah Finkelstein
  4. Eleanor C. Sayre
  5. Adrian M. Madsen
  6. Sarah B. McKagan
  7. Akira Miyake
  8. Jane Stout

In Education

  1. Jennifer Docktor
  2. Jose P. Mestre
  3. S. Pollock
  4. Eleanor C. Sayre
  5. Adrian M. Madsen
  6. Sarah B. McKagan
  7. Noah Finkelstein
  8. Natalie R. Nielsen

Citations in the corpus