Synthesis of Discipline-Based Education Research in Physics.

By Jennifer Docktor, Jose P. Mestre. 2014

489 citations recorded by the source corpus.

information in analogical transfer, Psychol. Bull. 115, 381 (1994). [134] S. Y. Lin and C. Singh, Using isomorphic problems to learn introductory physics, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 020104 (2011). [135] D. Hammer, A. Elby, R. Scherr, and E. F. Redish, in Transfer of Learning from a Modern Multidisciplinary Perspective, edited by J. Mestre (Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT, 2005), pp. 89–119. [136] J. Tuminaro, A cognitive framework for analyzing and describing introductory students use and understanding of mathematics in physics, Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland, 2004 (unpublished). [137] J. S. Brown, A. Collins, and P. Duguid, Situated cognition and the culture of learning, Educ. Res. 18, 32 (1989). [138] A. Mason and C. Singh, Revisiting categorization, in Proceedings of the 2009 National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST) Annual Meeting (Garden Grove, CA, 2009) Symposium S2.2, pp. 3–21. [139] F. Mateycik, D. Jonassen, and N. S. Rebello, Using Similarity Rating Tasks to Assess Case Reuse in Problem Solving, Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference (Ann Arbor, MI, 2010).[AIP Conference Proceedings 1179, 201, (2009)]. [140] S. F. Wolf, D. P. Dougherty, and G. Kortemeyer, Empirical approach to interpreting card-sorting data, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010124 (2012). [141] A. Carmichael, A. Larson, E. Gire, L. Loschky, and N. S. Rebello, How does visual attention differ between experts and novices on physics problems?, AIP Conf. Proc. 1289, 93 (2010). [142] D. Rosengrant, A. Van Heuvelen, and E. Etkina, Do students use and understand free-body diagrams?, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 5, 010108 (2009). [143] A. D. Smith, J. P. Mestre, and B. H. Ross, Eye gaze patterns as students study worked out examples in mechanics, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 6, 020118 (2010). [144] T. de Jong and M. G. M. Ferguson-Hessler, Cognitive structures of good and poor novice problem solvers in physics, J. Educ. Psychol. 78, 279 (1986). [145] J. L. Docktor, J. P. Mestre, and B. H. Ross, Impact of a short intervention on novices’ categorization criteria, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 020102 (2012). [146] S. F. Wolf, D. P. Dougherty, and G. Kortemeyer, Rigging the deck: Selecting good problems for expert-novice card-sorting experiments, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 020116 (2012). [147] M. Finegold and R. Mass, Differences in the process of solving physics problems between good problem solvers and poor problem solvers, Res. Sci. Technol. Educ. 3, 59 (1985). [148] L. N. Walsh, R. G. Howard, and B. Bowe, Phenomenographic study of students’ problem solving approaches in SYNTHESIS OF DISCIPLINE-BASED ... PHYS. REV. ST PHYS. EDUC. RES 10, 020119 (2014)

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/73c19d6068659c46c3d4ec9439853e2577c30f07

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

  1. Natalie R. Nielsen
  2. Susan Rundell Singer
  3. H. Schweingruber

In Education

  1. Natalie R. Nielsen
  2. Susan Rundell Singer
  3. H. Schweingruber

Citations in the corpus