Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link?
By Sarv Devaraj, Rajiv Kohli. Management Sciences, 2003
1,610 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/031a8ebd24acae25120d4b06cc25e2cb2bc33a83
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Andrew Burton-Jones
- Michael J. Gallivan
- Varun Grover
- Ephraim R. McLean
- William H. DeLone
- Jay-Ick Lim
- Vinod R. Singhal
- Stacie C. Petter
In Information Systems and Management
- Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi
- V. Venkatesh
- Andrew Burton-Jones
- Nripendra P. Rana
- Tao Zhou
- Ephraim R. McLean
- Samuel Fosso Wamba
- Stacie C. Petter
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi
- V. Venkatesh
- Andrew Burton-Jones
- Tao Zhou
- Nripendra P. Rana
- Stacie C. Petter
- Ephraim R. McLean
- William H. DeLone
Citations in the corpus
- Business Value of IT: An Essay on Expanding Research Directions to Keep up with the Times (2008, methodology): “Many recent studies demonstrate that our interlude with the productivity paradox was an artifact of time and measurement (Brynjolfsson and Hitt, 2000; Kohli and Devaraj, 2003 ).”
- Fueling Innovation through Information Technology in SMEs* (2008, neutral): “As a consequence, investment in IT by firms has dramatically escalated in recent times (Devaraj and Kohli 2003; Tippins and Soh 2003).”
- Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships (2008, methodology): “Others have created their own indexes of system quality using the dimensions identified by D&M in their original model (Coombs et al ., 2001) or via their own review of the system quality literature (Gable et al ., 2003).”
- Going Beyond the Dominant Paradigm for Information Technology Innovation Research: Emerging Concepts and Methods (2004, background): “These have included studies of automated teller machines (Dos Santos and Peffers, 1995), enterprise resource planning, (Hitt et al., 2001; McAfee, 2002), electronic data interchange (Mukhopadhyay et al., 1995) and hospital information systems (Devaraj and Kohli, 2003; Kohli and Devaraj, 2003).”
- Benefits of IT in supply chain management: an explorative study of progressive companies (2005, background): “In the recent literature for example Simchi-Levi et al. (2003), Dawson (2002) , Chopra & Meindl (2001), and Levary (2000) provide comprehensive discussions on the role of new information technology for SCM.”
- Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions (2014, background): “These benefits include improved profitability and improved organizational performance (e.g. Devaraj and Kohli 2003; Hendricks et al. 2007; Melville et al. 2004; Sabherwal et al. 2006), as well as efficient and effective business processes or working routines on an individual level (e.g.…”
- The Transformation of the Innovation Process: How Digital Tools are Changing Work, Collaboration, and Organizations in New Product Development* (2020, neutral): “A project-level study is a preferred method in determining the impact of IT tools since most of this tool use occurs at the project-level by the designers, engineers, and project managers (Barczak, Hultink, and Sultan, 2008; Devaraj and Kohli, 2003; Marion et al., 2012; McGrath and Iansiti, 1998).”
- The impact of enterprise systems on corporate performance: A study of ERP, SCM, and CRM system implementations (2007, methodology): “, 1999), (2) the time period studied (Devaraj and Kohli, 2000), (3) the method of analysis (Robey and Boudreau, 1999), and (4) the presence of important intermediate variables (Barua et al.”
- Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions (2008, background): “Low adoption and underutilization of ITs have been suggested to be key reasons for “productivity paradox”—that is, a contradictory relationship between IT investment and firm performance (Landauer, 1995; Sichel, 1997; Devaraj & Kohli, 2003).”
- A Process-Oriented Perspective on the Alignment of Information Technology and Business Strategy (2007, background): “We also find a high degree of correlation between IT use and IT business value in Table 8, reminiscent of the known link between IT use and IT impacts [25, 40].”
- What's Different about Social Media Networks? A Framework and Research Agenda (2014, background): “For example, people who use a system more than others often perform better (Devaraj and Kohli 2003), and users may employ systems in ways that were unintended or unanticipated by designers (Boudreau and Robey 2005).”