Going Beyond the Dominant Paradigm for Information Technology Innovation Research: Emerging Concepts and Methods
By Robert G. Fichman. Journal of the AIS, 2004
641 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1f009ed856ea14287fe556124b9d86753bd791b6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- Satish Nambisan
- Kalle J. Lyytinen
- Ann Majchrzak
- Mary C. Lacity
- Rajiv Kohli
- Nigel P. Melville
- Luying Xu
- Lei Guo
In Strategy and Management
- Foster J. Provost
- Satish Nambisan
- Mary C. Lacity
- Luying Xu
- Lei Guo
- Kalle J. Lyytinen
- Ann Majchrzak
- Michael Song
Citations in the corpus
- The Effects of Digital Transformation on Firm Performance: Evidence from China’s Manufacturing Sector (2021, background): “The enabling role of IT in the operational processes of organizations has been widely recognized [15].”
- Social Contagion and Information Technology Diffusion: The Adoption of Electronic Medical Records in U.S. Hospitals (2010, methodology): “The adoption and diffusion of innovations has been examined in multiple disciplines and from a variety of theoretical perspectives (for review, see Wejnert 2002, Strang and Soule 1998, Fichman 2004).”
- A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research (2006, background): “In addition to these, researchers will continue to be inspired by exploring boundaries within and outside the dominant IT paradigm (Fichman, 2004).”
- Cloud computing adoption by SMEs in the north east of England: A multi-perspective framework (2013, background): “The dominant paradigm in studying IT innovation adoption involves identifying contingency factors that facilitate or hinder the adoption decisions in organisations (Fichman, 2004; Troshani et al., 2011).”
- Digital innovation: A review and synthesis (2019, background): “A different perspective is that firms may fall prey to external influences that drive ill ‐ conceived initiation of digital business innovation (Fichman, 2004; Kaganer, Pawlowski, & Wiley ‐ Patton, 2010; King et al., 1994).”
- Network-Based Marketing: Identifying Likely Adopters Via Consumer Networks (2006, background): “Qualitatively, researchers have identified numerous factors that facilitate or hinder technology adoption (Fichman, 2004), as well as social factors that influence product adoption (Rogers, 2003).”
- IT Capability and Digital Transformation: A Firm Performance Perspective (2016, background): “IT proactive stance refers to the ability of a firm to actively and constantly search for innovative ways of using IT resources to identify and create new opportunities and ideas (Fichman, 2004).”
- Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World (2017, background): “By and large, their efforts were originally focused on effects of digitizing internal organizational processes (e.g., Fichman 2004; Swanson 1994).”
- Chasing the Hottest IT: Effects of Information Technology Fashion on Organizations (2010, background): “Consequently, “certain innovations may garner managerial attention and organizational adoption out of all proportion to the ultimate benefits flowing from their actual use” (Fichman, 2004: 327-328).”