Treatment Strength and Integrity: Models and Methods.
By D. Cordray, G. Pion. 2006
89 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0264cd02bcba0b07f8490e0963fb07392d00f14b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Chris S. Hulleman
- S. Rimm-Kaufman
- Tashia Abry
- William R. Penuel
- Alison E. Baroody
- Barry J. Fishman
- Timothy W. Curby
- D. Cordray
In Economics and Econometrics
Citations in the corpus
- Large‐scale science education intervention research we can use (2012, background): “By improving treatment integrity, researchers believe, the gap between the potential and realized treatment effectiveness can be reduced (Cordray & Pion, 2006).”
- Moving From the Lab to the Field: The Role of Fidelity and Achieved Relative Intervention Strength (2009, methodology): “Cordray and Pion (2006) stated that the outcome (Yi) for a participant is determined by the achieved fidelity of the treatment, as implemented and received by that individual (tTx).”
- Efficacy of the Responsive Classroom Approach (2014, background): “The RC approach presents yet another challenge in measuring fidelity (Cordray & Pion, 2006).”
- Fidelity Measurement in Consultation: Psychometric Issues and Preliminary Examination (2009, unknown): “…congruity between a treatment and its ex pected outcomes (based on anticipated, re search-supported effects under varying levels of strength), and parents' and teachers' uptake (receptivity to or engagement with the inter vention) all influence fidelity considerations (Cordray & Pion, 2006).”
- A Systematic Review of Theory-Driven Evaluation Practice From 1990 to 2009 (2011, background): “…theory-driven evaluation should be able to discover whether such breakdowns can be attributed to implementation failure (e.g., treatment integrity; Cordray & Pion, 2006), whether the context is unsuited to operate the mechanisms by which outcomes are expected to occur (Pawson & Tilley, 1997), or…”