Assessing self-regulated learning using diary measures with university students
By Bernhard Schmitz, Julia Klug, Michaela Schmidt. 2011
90 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/01fa35db7cf7951ef0f3770fed590c4056d5c88b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Ernesto Panadero
- Sanna Järvelä
- Julia Klug
- Allyson Fiona Hadwin
- Anne Roth
- Sabine Ogrin
- Lindsay McCardle
- Bernhard Schmitz
Citations in the corpus
- A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research (2017, background): “This theoretical proposal gives a major emphasis to the role of self-monitoring in SRL (Schmitz et al., 2011).”
- Assessing self-regulated learning in higher education: a systematic literature review of self-report instruments (2016, background): “Learning diaries enable researchers to sensitively measure daily or weekly learning strategies over a certain period of time (Schmitz et al. 2011).”
- Third wave of measurement in the self-regulated learning field: when measurement and intervention come hand in hand (2016, methodology): “It is understood as a systematic observation and documentation of one’s thoughts, feelings, and actions regarding goal attainment (Schmitz et al., 2011).”
- Using multiple, contextualized data sources to measure learners’ perceptions of their self-regulated learning (2015, background): “These include diaries (Schmitz et al. 2011), microanalysis (Cleary 2011), and think aloud protocols (Greene et al. 2011).”