Measuring teamwork mental models to support training needs assessment, development, and evaluation: two empirical studies†
By Kimberly A. Smith-Jentsch, Gwendolyn E. Campbell, Dana M. Milanovich, A. M. Reynolds. 2001
209 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/00f013849b44d638eae2ecddfb7326465205da74
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Kyle Lewis
- Susan Mohammed
- Katherine Hamilton
- Lori A. Ferzandi
- Eduardo Salas
- Leigh Thompson
- L. Van Boven
- Mohammed K. Khalil
In Social Psychology
- Kyle Lewis
- Susan Mohammed
- Katherine Hamilton
- Lori A. Ferzandi
- Eduardo Salas
- Scott I. Tannenbaum
- Kimberly A. Smith-Jentsch
- Leigh Thompson
Citations in the corpus
- Measuring Sharedness of Team-Related Knowledge: Design and Validation of a Shared Mental Model Instrument (2007, background): “Smith-Jentsch et al. (2001) indicated that team work consists of four dimensions: (1) information exchange, which includes passing on information, providing big picture summaries, and seeking information from all available sources; (2) dynamic interaction, which includes proper phraseology,…”
- A Look into the Mind of the Negotiator: Mental Models in Negotiation (2003, background): “…their area of expertise in terms of abstract causal relations, whereas novices think about such problems in terms of surface-level features (Chase & Simon, 1973; Chi, Feltovich, & Glaser, 1981; Chi, Glaser, & Farr, 1988; Smith-Jentsch, Campbell, Milanovich, & Reynolds, 2001; Wyman & Randel, 1998).”
- Guided Team Self-Correction (2008, methodology): “Results indicated that rank, but not overall Navy experience, was positively associated with similarity to the expert model (Smith-Jentsch et al., 2000).”
- Metaphor No More: A 15-Year Review of the Team Mental Model Construct (2010, methodology): “TMM accuracy has been primarily gauged via multiple (typically three) subject matter experts (SMEs) whose scores are averaged to represent one referent model after establishing reasonable interrater reliability (e.g., Cooke et al., 2001; Cooke et al., 2003; Edwards et al., 2006; Lim & Klein, 2006; S”
- Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation. (2003, methodology): “Researchers have used domain experts (e.g., Kraiger, Salas, & Cannon-Bowers, 1995; Smith-Jentsch, Campbell, Milanovich, & Reynolds, 2001 ), in-depth interviews (e.g., Rentsch & Klimoski, 2001), technical documentation, or a combination of these (e.g., Mathieu et al., 2000; Serfaty, Entin, & Johnsto”