Beliefs and perceptions about the future: A measurement of future time perspective
By Jenefer Husman, Duane F. Shell. 2008
273 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/00441a3ac9ae2b5df6eee6fd5ec2426aeaee25f7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- D. Schunk
- Allan Wigfield
- B. Zimmerman
- Maarten Vansteenkiste
- Ernesto Panadero
- Katherine Muenks
- Ji Seung Yang
- Lisa C. Benson
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- D. Schunk
- Allan Wigfield
- Maarten Vansteenkiste
- W. Lens
- Jenna Cambria
- Adam Kirn
- J. Bilde
- B. Zimmerman
In Social Psychology
- Allan Wigfield
- D. Schunk
- Maarten Vansteenkiste
- W. Lens
- Jenna Cambria
- B. Zimmerman
- J. Bilde
- Katherine Muenks
Citations in the corpus
- Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance (2011, background): “Second, both academic and general ability to delay gratifi cation are acquired in conjunction with other important developmental milestones, such as future time perspective or future orientation (Bembenutty & Karabenick, 2004; Husman & Shell, 2008; Steinberg et al., 2009).”
- Associations Between Grit, Motivation, and Achievement in High School Students (2017, background): “Husman and Shell (2008) defined FTP-value as the relative importance individuals place on future (as opposed to present) goals, and FTP-connectedness as the extent to which individuals feel connected to the future.”
- Identity‐based motivation: Connections between first‐year students' engineering role identities and future‐time perspectives (2020, methodology): “Internal consistency for this study, as evaluated with Cronbach's alpha, was .88 for connectedness, .78 for value, .84 for perceived instrumentality, .87 for perceptions of the future, and .93 for expectancy (Husman & Shell, 2008; McGough, Kirn, & Benson, 2016).”
- Understanding the association between future time perspective and self-regulated learning through the lens of self-determination theory (2011, background): “…orientation (as the ZTPI does) but also a variety of other facets, including the cognitive and dynamic aspect of FTP, the goal content, extension, degree of realism, specificity and the structure of the future time perspective (see Creten et al., 2001; De Volder & Lens, 1982; Husman & Shell, 2008).”
- Engineering Students' Perceptions of Problem Solving and Their Future (2018, methodology): “The implications of the future on present actions are captured by perceived instrumentality from FTP theory (Husman & Lens, 1999; Husman & Shell, 2008; Miller, DeBacker, & Greene, 1999).”
- Expectancy-value theory: retrospective and prospective (2010, background): “Recently, Husman and Shell (2008) developed a measure of students’ perspective on the future that includes different dimensions of this perspective.”
- The role of future time perspective in psychological contracts: A study among older workers (2010, background): “In contrast to objective calendar time, future time perspective (FTP) focuses on peoples’ subjective time experiences (Husman & Shell, 2008; Lang & Carstensen, 2002).”