David Feinberg

Experimental and Cognitive Psychology · 2004–2014

A researcher in the Science corpus: 12 papers; trusts 35 researchers and is trusted by 16 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 104 citations into it; #1,171 of 9,731 by trust here, #1,366 by citations
• Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics — 43 citations into it
• Developmental Biology — 39 citations into it; #417 of 711 by trust here, #194 by citations
• Marketing — 33 citations into it; #1,887 of 6,289 by trust here, #1,670 by citations
• Clinical Psychology — 24 citations into it
• Social Psychology — 19 citations into it
• Sociology and Political Science — 18 citations into it; #18,916 of 22,756 by trust here, #13,822 by citations
• Cognitive Neuroscience — 13 citations into it; #3,822 of 10,852 by trust here, #6,180 by citations

Whom David Feinberg trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Ian Penton-Voak
2. D. Puts
3. Gillian Rhodes
4. B. Jones
5. Anthony C. Little
6. Bernard Paul Tiddeman
7. Paul P. G. Boersma
8. David I. Perrett
9. Susan M. Hughes
10. Steven W. Gangestad

Who trusts David Feinberg overall

1. C. C. Tigue
2. B. Jones
3. Anthony C. Little
4. J. Vukovic
5. K. Pisanski
6. L. DeBruine
7. D. Puts
8. Diana J. Borak
9. Casey A. Klofstad
10. J. O'Connor

Papers from David Feinberg's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers David Feinberg trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Acoustic Theory Of Speech Production
2. Vocal and visual attractiveness are related in women
3. Male facial attractiveness: evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design
4. Manipulations of fundamental and formant frequencies influence the attractiveness of human male voices
5. Facial symmetry and judgements of apparent health: Support for a “good genes” explanation of the attractiveness–symmetry relationship
6. Mating context and menstrual phase affect women's preferences for male voice pitch
7. Facial masculinity and fluctuating asymmetry
8. Populational differences in attractiveness judgements of male and female faces: Comparing British and Jamaican samples
9. Inferences of Competence from Faces Predict Election Outcomes (Science)
10. Anatomical constraints generate honesty: acoustic cues to age and weight in the roars of red deer stags

Their papers

• A domain-specific opposite-sex bias in human preferences for manipulated voice pitch. (2010) — 203 citations
• Voice pitch influences voting behavior (2012) — 312 citations
• Vocal indicators of body size in men and women: a meta-analysis (2014) — 200 citations
• Cross-Cultural Variation in Mate Preferences for Averageness, Symmetry, Body Size, and Masculinity (2013) — 118 citations
• Human preference for masculinity differs according to context in faces, bodies, voices, and smell (2011) — 102 citations
• Taller men are less sensitive to cues of dominance in other men (2010) — 122 citations
• Correlated preferences for men's facial and vocal masculinity (2008) — 204 citations
• Self-rated attractiveness predicts individual differences in women's preferences for masculine men's voices (2008) — 101 citations
• Are human faces and voices ornaments signaling common underlying cues to mate value? (2008) — 153 citations
• The voice and face of woman: One ornament that signals quality? (2005) — 148 citations
• Manipulations of fundamental and formant frequencies influence the attractiveness of human male voices (2005) — 432 citations
• The relationship between shape symmetry and perceived skin condition in male facial attractiveness (2004) — 118 citations