L. DeBruine
Experimental and Cognitive Psychology · 2004–2018
A researcher in the Science corpus: 17 papers; trusts 20 researchers and is trusted by 12 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 123 citations into it; #1,693 of 9,731 by trust here, #1,638 by citations
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics — 45 citations into it
- Developmental Biology — 40 citations into it
- Sociology and Political Science — 39 citations into it
- Clinical Psychology — 32 citations into it; #2,416 of 8,024 by trust here, #4,608 by citations
- Marketing — 31 citations into it; #1,169 of 6,289 by trust here, #1,529 by citations
- Cognitive Neuroscience — 24 citations into it
- Social Psychology — 24 citations into it
Whom L. DeBruine trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- Gillian Rhodes
- Ian Penton-Voak
- David Feinberg
- D. Puts
- Anthony C. Little
- Bernard Paul Tiddeman
- Steven W. Gangestad
- B. Fink
- Ernst Fehr
- David I. Perrett
Who trusts L. DeBruine overall
- L. Sugiyama
- Justin H. Park
- Mark Schaller
- David Feinberg
- C. C. Tigue
- B. Jones
- Joshua M. Tybur
- Anthony C. Little
- A. Alvergne
- Christopher D. Watkins
Papers from L. DeBruine's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers L. DeBruine trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Populational differences in attractiveness judgements of male and female faces: Comparing British and Jamaican samples
- Male facial attractiveness: evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design
- Manipulations of fundamental and formant frequencies influence the attractiveness of human male voices
- Vocal and visual attractiveness are related in women
- Acoustic Theory Of Speech Production
- Mating context and menstrual phase affect women's preferences for male voice pitch
- Inferences of Competence from Faces Predict Election Outcomes (Science)
- Anatomical constraints generate honesty: acoustic cues to age and weight in the roars of red deer stags
- The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. (Annual Review of Psychology)
- Are human faces and voices ornaments signaling common underlying cues to mate value?
Their papers
- Justify your alpha (2018) — 383 citations
- Social influence in human face preference: men and women are influenced more for long-term than short-term attractiveness decisions (2008) — 106 citations
- A domain-specific opposite-sex bias in human preferences for manipulated voice pitch. (2010) — 203 citations
- A cue of kinship promotes cooperation for the public good (2008) — 165 citations
- Face Research Lab London Set (2017) — 174 citations
- Vocal indicators of body size in men and women: a meta-analysis (2014) — 200 citations
- Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research (2011) — 903 citations
- Taller men are less sensitive to cues of dominance in other men (2010) — 122 citations
- Individual differences in dominance perception: Dominant men are less sensitive to facial cues of male dominance (2010) — 124 citations
- Women's preferences for masculinity in male faces are predicted by pathogen disgust, but not by moral or sexual disgust (2010) — 117 citations
- Correlated preferences for men's facial and vocal masculinity (2008) — 204 citations
- Facial correlates of sociosexuality (2008) — 206 citations
- Face aftereffects depend on perceptual category rather than structural encoding. (2008) — 92 citations
- Self-rated attractiveness predicts individual differences in women's preferences for masculine men's voices (2008) — 101 citations
- Visual adaptation to masculine and feminine faces influences generalized preferences and perceptions of trustworthiness (2006) — 122 citations
- The voice and face of woman: One ornament that signals quality? (2005) — 148 citations
- Resemblance to self increases the appeal of child faces to both men and women (2004) — 129 citations