Male facial attractiveness: evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design
By V. Johnston, Rebecca Hagel, Melissa Franklin, B. Fink, Karl Grammer. 2001
631 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Marketing, Museology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f6fa52e9a4093ede1f7596d2d5c990001569dca4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- David Feinberg
- B. Jones
- L. DeBruine
- Anthony C. Little
- D. Puts
- Gillian Rhodes
- Steven W. Gangestad
- M. Haselton
In Marketing
- David Feinberg
- B. Jones
- Anthony C. Little
- L. DeBruine
- D. Puts
- Norman P. Li
- Gillian Rhodes
- Ian Penton-Voak
In Museology
- David Feinberg
- B. Jones
- Anthony C. Little
- L. DeBruine
- D. Puts
- David I. Perrett
- Ian Penton-Voak
- Steven W. Gangestad
Citations in the corpus
- Non-commercial Research and Educational Use including without Limitation Use in Instruction at Your Institution, Sending It to Specific Colleagues That You Know, and Providing a Copy to Your Institution's Administrator. All Other Uses, Reproduction and Distribution, including without Limitation Comm (2005, neutral): “All these methods require considerable A u t h o r ' s p e r s o n a l”
- Desiring the Muscular Ideal: Men's Body Satisfaction in the United States, Ukraine, and Ghana (2007, background): “…preferences for short-term and long-term partners parallels other research, which finds that women prefer characteristics such as facial masculinity (Johnston et al., 2001) and muscularity (Frederick & Haselton, 2006) more strongly when considering men as short-term rather than long-term partners.”
- Facial masculinity and fluctuating asymmetry (2003, result): “The literature is not consistent in this regard, however; other studies have found that women find masculine faces more attractive (e.g., Johnston et al., 2001; Keating, 1985) or that they prefer neither masculinized nor feminized faces over average faces (e.g., Swaddle & Reierson, 2002).”
- Conditional mate preferences: Factors influencing preferences for height (2008, background): “Support for this heritable fitness perspective comes from research showing that women prefer these traits most strongly when the only benefits they might receive are genetic, such as in a short-term mate (Frederick & Haselton, 2007; Johnston et al., 2001 ) or when they are most likely to conceive, ”
- Mating context and menstrual phase affect women's preferences for male voice pitch (2005, background): “For example, women’s mate preferences vary with probability of conception, such that women in the follicular (fertile) phase of their menstrual cycles exhibit preference shifts toward more masculine facial features ( Johnston, Hagel, Franklin, Fink, & Grammer, 2001; Penton-Voak et al., 1999; Penton”
- Beyond "Pink It and Shrink It" Perceived Product Gender, Aesthetics, and Product Evaluation (2015, background): “Skin condition has also been explored as an indicator of the value of a female mate (Symons, 1979): Smooth skin signals female fertility and affects male judgments of attractiveness (Johnston et al., 2001).”
- Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: what, whether, and why. (2006, methodology): “... how might it be the case that the underlying reasons may be different? We ran Study 5 as an open-ended survey to explore more carefully the specific features people consider physically attractive for casual sex and why they think they do. We were interested in gathering additional information re”
- High salivary testosterone is linked to masculine male facial appearance in humans. (2004, methodology): “The results of these studies are somewhat inconsistent, with some finding an overall preference for masculine faces (e.g., Johnston et al., 2001) and others finding preferences for average (Swaddle & Reierson, 2002) or feminised male faces (Perrett et al., 1998).”
- Cross-Cultural Variation in Mate Preferences for Averageness, Symmetry, Body Size, and Masculinity (2013, background): “…competence) are preferred over feminine faces (cueing parental and resource investment) by women in the fertile phase of their menstrual cycle (Johnston et al., 2001; Little, Jones, & DeBruine, 2008; Penton-Voak & Perrett, 2000; Penton-Voak et al., 1999) or life cycle (Little et al., 2010)…”