Ian Penton-Voak

Experimental and Cognitive Psychology · 2000–2015

A researcher in the Science corpus: 13 papers; trusts 7 researchers and is trusted by 40 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 30 citations into it; #446 of 9,731 by trust here, #162 by citations
• Sociology and Political Science — 20 citations into it
• Cognitive Neuroscience — 14 citations into it
• Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics — 8 citations into it; #332 of 6,648 by trust here, #930 by citations
• Marketing — 8 citations into it; #891 of 6,289 by trust here, #986 by citations
• Safety Research — 8 citations into it
• Clinical Psychology — 6 citations into it; #879 of 8,024 by trust here, #1,361 by citations

Whom Ian Penton-Voak trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. B. Fink
2. Steven W. Gangestad
3. David I. Perrett
4. Daniel Kahneman
5. Michael D. Jennions
6. Jeffry A. Simpson
7. Bernard Paul Tiddeman

Who trusts Ian Penton-Voak overall

1. Steven W. Gangestad
2. David Feinberg
3. Daniel J. Kruger
4. D. Puts
5. Gillian Rhodes
6. Anthony C. Little
7. L. DeBruine
8. B. Jones
9. Gavin Buckingham
10. Meghan P. Provost

Papers from Ian Penton-Voak's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Ian Penton-Voak trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Facial masculinity and fluctuating asymmetry
2. The relationship between shape symmetry and perceived skin condition in male facial attractiveness
3. Facial symmetry and judgements of apparent health: Support for a “good genes” explanation of the attractiveness–symmetry relationship
4. MHC heterozygosity confers a selective advantage against multiple-strain infections (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)
5. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. (Psychological bulletin)
6. Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: Further evidence
7. Evolutionary Psychology of Facial Attractiveness
8. Populational differences in attractiveness judgements of male and female faces: Comparing British and Jamaican samples
9. Inferences of Competence from Faces Predict Election Outcomes (Science)
10. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. (Annual Review of Psychology)

Their papers

• Cross-cultural effects of color, but not morphological masculinity, on perceived attractiveness of men's faces (2012) — 119 citations
• Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015) — 7,174 citations
• The watching eyes effect in the Dictator Game: it's not how much you give, it's being seen to give something (2013) — 241 citations
• Investigating an imprinting-like phenomenon in humans: Partners and opposite-sex parents have similar hair and eye colour (2003) — 138 citations
• Personality judgments from natural and composite facial images: More evidence for a "kernel of truth" in social perception (2006) — 321 citations
• MHC-heterozygosity and human facial attractiveness (2005) — 202 citations
• Populational differences in attractiveness judgements of male and female faces: Comparing British and Jamaican samples (2004) — 204 citations
• High salivary testosterone is linked to masculine male facial appearance in humans. (2004) — 390 citations
• The relationship between shape symmetry and perceived skin condition in male facial attractiveness (2004) — 118 citations
• Evolutionary Psychology of Facial Attractiveness (2002) — 483 citations
• Facial symmetry and judgements of apparent health: Support for a “good genes” explanation of the attractiveness–symmetry relationship (2001) — 359 citations
• Male facial attractiveness: Perceived personality and shifting female preferences for male traits across the menstrual cycle (2001) — 98 citations
• Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: Further evidence (2000) — 554 citations