Correlated preferences for men's facial and vocal masculinity

204 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Voice pitch influences voting behavior (2012, methodology): “This level of pitch manipulation has been used successfully in previous studies on voice pitch (Apicella & Feinberg, 2009; Feinberg et al., 2008; Jones, Feinberg, DeBruine, Little, & Vukovic, 2008; Jones et al., 2010; Vukovic et al., 2008).”
Self-rated attractiveness predicts individual differences in women's preferences for masculine men's voices (2008, background): “Little & Mannion, 2006; Little et al., 2001; Penton-Voak et al., 2003), there has been far less research into between-individual differences in women’s preferences for masculine cues in men’s voices (Feinberg et al., 2008).”
A domain-specific opposite-sex bias in human preferences for manipulated voice pitch. (2010, background): “…was correlated with attractiveness ratings of the voices have reported positive associations between pitch and attractiveness for women’s voices (e.g. Collins & Missing 2003; Feinberg et al. 2008a) and negative associations between pitch and attractiveness for men’s voices (e.g. Collins 2000).”
Human preference for masculinity differs according to context in faces, bodies, voices, and smell (2011, background): “…of male faces (Perrett et al. 1998; Penton-Voak et al. 1999; Little et al. 2001), voices (Feinberg, Jones, Little, et al. 2005; Puts 2005; Feinberg et al. 2008), bodies (Pawlowski and Jasienska 2005; Little, Jones, and Burriss 2007), and putative male pheromones (Cornwell et al. 2004;…”