Facial masculinity and fluctuating asymmetry
By Steven W. Gangestad, R. Thornhill. 2003
192 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dfb63b56c791ba36a8d7f616aee46cf4a3a11ada
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- B. Jones
- David Feinberg
- L. DeBruine
- Anthony C. Little
- D. Puts
- Steven W. Gangestad
- Gillian Rhodes
- D. Schmitt
Citations in the corpus
- Adaptive attentional attunement: evidence for mating-related perceptual bias (2007, background): “For example, the extent to which a woman attends to attractive male targets may depend on the stage of her menstrual cycle (Haselton & Gangestad, 2006), in concert with the extent to which male targets display cues to masculinity or good genes (Gangestad & Thornhill, 2003).”
- Mating context and menstrual phase affect women's preferences for male voice pitch (2005, background): “Evidence from nonhuman animals (reviewed in Andersson, 1994) and humans (e.g., Gangestad & Thornhill, 2003; Scheib, Gangestad, & Thornhill, 1999) suggests that some masculine traits are reliable fitness indicators, and genetic transmission of these fitness benefits has been demonstrated in some sp”
- Correlated preferences for men's facial and vocal masculinity (2008, background): “Other work on humans has determined that men also send multiple correlated cues of mate quality, such as symmetry and masculinity (Gangestad & Thornhill, 2003) and symmetry and visible skin condition (Jones et al., 2004), potentially producing a better overall assessment of generalized mate quality…”
- Women's preferences for masculinity in male faces are predicted by pathogen disgust, but not by moral or sexual disgust (2010, background): “Male facial masculinity is also positively correlated with symmetry, a potential signal of developmental stability (Gangestad & Thornhill, 2003; Little, Jones, Waitt et al., 2008).”
- Beauty and the beast: mechanisms of sexual selection in humans (2010, background): “Some studies have found that men's symmetry and masculinity correlate, as might be predicted if both features index underlying genetic quality (Gangestad & Thornhill, 2003; Scheib et al., 1999).”
- The relationship between shape symmetry and perceived skin condition in male facial attractiveness (2004, methodology): “Furthermore, a masculinity index derived from measurements of facial characteristics, first identified as being sexually dimorphic, was not associated with symmetry in male faces (Penton-Voak et al., 2001; but for a positive result, see Gangestad & Thornhill, 2003).”
- Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating (2005, background): “It is, however, a strategy based on selectively desiring men of high status, dominance, and genetic quality (Gangestad & Thornhill 1997; 2003; Thornhill & Gangestad 2003).”
- The relative importance of the face and body in judgments of human physical attractiveness (2009, background): “Correlations between facial symmetry and facial sexual dimorphism have also been taken as evidence that both traits signal some common underlying value (Gangestad & Thornhill, 2003; Little et al., 2008).”
- Facial symmetry and judgements of attractiveness, health and personality (2006, background): “Two recent studies (Gangestad & Thornhill, 2003; Thornhill & Gangestad, 2006) indicate that the degree of facial masculinity is an honest signal of quality in men.”
- Are human preferences for facial symmetry focused on signals of developmental instability (2004, background): “The evidence for a relationship between masculinity and symmetry is equally conflicting (Gangestad and Thornhill, 2003; Penton-Voak et al., 2001; Scheib et al., 1999).”
- THE EVOLUTION OF HUMAN PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS (2005, background): “Jaw size and prominent cheekbones (the first a masculine trait, the second not; see also Gangestad & Thornhill 2003a; compare Koehler et al. 2004) covaried with symmetry and was able to account for its association with attractiveness.”