The relationship between shape symmetry and perceived skin condition in male facial attractiveness

By B. Jones, Anthony C. Little, David Feinberg, Ian Penton-Voak, Bernard Paul Tiddeman, David I. Perrett. 2004

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Marketing, Museology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/99a37fb7b73ba4cc2f451f52b1c4ddf9d516c171

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. David Feinberg
2. B. Jones
3. L. DeBruine
4. Anthony C. Little
5. Steven W. Gangestad
6. Ian Penton-Voak
7. D. Puts
8. G. Scheyd

In Marketing

1. David Feinberg
2. B. Jones
3. Anthony C. Little
4. L. DeBruine
5. Ian Penton-Voak
6. Steven W. Gangestad
7. G. Scheyd
8. David I. Perrett

In Museology

1. David Feinberg
2. Ian Penton-Voak
3. B. Jones
4. Anthony C. Little
5. Steven W. Gangestad
6. L. DeBruine
7. David I. Perrett

Citations in the corpus

• Correlated preferences for men's facial and vocal masculinity (2008, background): “…determined that men also send multiple correlated cues of mate quality, such as symmetry and masculinity (Gangestad & Thornhill, 2003) and symmetry and visible skin condition (Jones et al., 2004), potentially producing a better overall assessment of generalized mate quality (Johnstone, 1995, 1996).”
• The voice and face of woman: One ornament that signals quality? (2005, unknown): “Images were made symmetrical by first mirror flipping the image and, second, the averaging color, shape, and texture information with that of the original image (see Jones et al., 2004).”
• MHC-heterozygosity and human facial attractiveness (2005, methodology): “Like Jones, Little, Feinberg, et al. (2004) and Jones, Little, Burt et al. (2004) , we find that skin condition might, in itself, be a direct visual cue to mate quality, as it correlates with attractiveness judgements even when information about facial shape is removed.”
• Facial symmetry and judgements of attractiveness, health and personality (2006, background): “More recently, Jones et al. (2004) also noted that some cues to facial symmetry may remain in half faces.”
• THE EVOLUTION OF HUMAN PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS (2005, background): “…reliably account for moderate amounts of variation in attractiveness, symmetry does not: Grammer & Thornhill (1994), Baudouin & Tiberghein (2004), Jones et al. (2004), Hume & Montgomerie (2001), and Scheib et al. (1999) report positive findings, whereas Rikowski & Grammer (1999), R. Thornhill &…”
• Father-offspring resemblance predicts paternal investment in humans (2009, background): “Although recent studies suggest that individuals respond similarly to real and transformed faces (Jones et al. 2004) and to faces transformed using different methods (DeBruine et al.”