Mary‐Anne Lea

Ecology · 2001–2017

A researcher in the Science corpus: 10 papers; trusts 12 researchers and is trusted by 6 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Mary‐Anne Lea trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. C. Guinet
  2. Guy Duhamel
  3. Katrina L. Phillips
  4. F. Bonadonna
  5. J. Georges
  6. L. Dubroca
  7. Y. Cherel
  8. G. Jackson
  9. P. Nichols
  10. C. Ravier

Who trusts Mary‐Anne Lea overall

  1. Y. Cherel
  2. M. Tinker
  3. C. Guinet
  4. K. Kock
  5. Daniel P. Costa
  6. Michael A. Litzow
  7. B. McClintock

Papers from Mary‐Anne Lea's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Mary‐Anne Lea trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. SCALE‐DEPENDENT PREDATOR–PREY INTERACTIONS: THE HIERARCHICAL SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF SEABIRDS AND PREY
  2. MATERNAL CARE IN THE SUBANTARCTIC FUR SEALS ON AMSTERDAM ISLAND
  3. Foraging habitat and diving activity of lactating Subantarctic fur seals in relation to sea-surface temperatures at Amsterdam Island
  4. Foraging ground fidelity and route-choice tactics of a marine predator: the Antarctic fur seal Arctocephalus gazella
  5. Exploitation of mesoscale oceanographic features by grey-headed albatross Thalassarche chrysostoma in the southern Indian Ocean
  6. Inter-annual variability in the breeding performance of seabirds in relation to oceanographic anomalies that affect the Crozet and the Kerguelen sectors of the Southern Ocean
  7. Foraging ecology of subantarctic fur seals Arctocephalus tropicalis breeding on Amsterdam Island: seasonal changes in relation to maternal characteristics and pup growth
  8. SEX DIFFERENCES IN PARENTAL INVESTMENT AND CHICK GROWTH IN WANDERING ALBATROSSES: FITNESS CONSEQUENCES
  9. Spatial distribution of foraging in female Antarctic fur seals Arctocephalus gazella in relation to oceanographic variables: a scale-dependent approach using geographic information systems
  10. State-dependent fertility in pinnipeds: contrasting capital and income breeders

Their papers