SCALE‐DEPENDENT PREDATOR–PREY INTERACTIONS: THE HIERARCHICAL SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF SEABIRDS AND PREY

By P. Fauchald, K. Erikstad, H. Skarsfjord. 2000

312 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dea234968fa710d9da136def79943b7618cb8b5d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Spatial interaction between seabirds and prey: review and synthesis (2009, background): “In the Barents Sea, maturing capelin start a spawning migration from the central parts in late winter towards the coast where they spawn in early spring (Gjøsæter 1998).”
Foraging destinations and marine habitat use of short-tailed albatrosses: A multi-scale approach using first-passage time analysis (2006, background): “Other important considerations are how an animal is sampling the environment (e.g., actively searching for prey or simply traveling through the area) and the spatial and temporal scales of response (Hunt and Schneider, 1987; Wiens, 1989; Fauchald, 1999; Fauchald et al., 2000).”
Overlap between vulnerable top predators and fisheries in the Benguela upwelling system: implications for marine protected areas (2009, background): “Often some overlap can be found at a coarse scale (> 300 km), but not at a fine scale (< 3 km) (e.g. Fauchald et al. 2000).”
SEARCH STRATEGIES OF A PURSUIT-DIVING MARINE BIRD AND THE PERSISTENCE OF PREY PATCHES (2003, methodology): “Animals searching for food over a heterogeneous landscape must search on multiple spatial and temporal scales (Russell et al. 1992, Fauchald et al. 2000).”
The spatial scale of plant-animal interactions: effects of resource availability and habitat structure (2011, background): “…organisms have been suggested as mechanisms controlling the demographic outcomes of food webs, as it happens when predators exert their pressure at progressively wider scales, affecting prey population dynamics and metapopulation structure (Fauchald et al. 2000, Holt 2002, Van Koppel et al. 2005).”
Local enhancement in a seabird: reaction distances and foraging consequence of predator aggregations (2014, background): “However, when prey are aggregated in patches that move constantly in space and time (Russell et al. 1992; Fauchald et al. 2000) and are difficult to locate from the sea surface, seabirds might not directly look for prey but instead they may use various mechanisms to detect cues for prey availability”
Lévy trajectories of Peruvian purse-seiners as an indicator of the spatial distribution of anchovy ( Engraulis ringens ) (2005, background): “…studies have focused on spatial predatoreprey relationships in a multi-scale, hierarchical patch dynamic framework, using various metrics (Rose and Leggett, 1990; Fauchald et al., 2000; Davoren et al., 2002; Fauchald and Erikstad, 2002; Bertrand et al., 2004a).”
Foraging ground fidelity and route-choice tactics of a marine predator: the Antarctic fur seal Arctocephalus gazella (2001, background): “Learning the predictable sub-area direction and not an actual patch position could be profitable, since the position of small scale patches could be unpredictable (Fauchald et al. 2000).”
Spatial distribution of foraging in female Antarctic fur seals Arctocephalus gazella in relation to oceanographic variables: a scale-dependent approach using geographic information systems (2001, background): “Furthermore, seabirds are generally able to roam over large areas, and are thus capable of exploiting the large scale patches of their prey (Fauchald et al. 2000).”
Techniques for cetacean-habitat modeling (2006, background): “…distribution of cetacean prey species, such as small pelagic schooling fish and crustaceans, can be viewed as a hierarchical patch structure in which high-density, small-scale patches are nested within low-density, large-scale patches (Weber et al. 1986, Murphy et al. 1988, Fauchald et al. 2000).”
Scale-dependent predator-prey interactions: the aggregative response of seabirds to prey under variable prey abundance and patchiness (2002, methodology): “This is because the aggregative response depends on responses and counter responses at several different scales (Rose & Leggett 1990, Russell et al. 1992, Fauchald et al. 2000).”
Oceanographic influences on seabirds and cetaceans of the eastern tropical Pacific: A review (2006, background): “…the appropriate scale of analysis (e.g. Schneider and Piatt, 1986; Heinemann et al., 1989; Erikstad et al., 1990; Piatt, 1990; Hunt et al., 1992; Jaquet et al., 1996; Logerwell and Hargreaves, 1996; Fauchald et al., 2000) and there is much yet to be learned from these types of investigations.”