Foraging habitat and diving activity of lactating Subantarctic fur seals in relation to sea-surface temperatures at Amsterdam Island
By J. Georges, F. Bonadonna, C. Guinet. 2000
96 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Ocean Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fc9489525ae03ccc30e583f0022e976a92358a39
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
- C. Guinet
- Daniel P. Costa
- Mary‐Anne Lea
- Mark A. Hindell
- Y. Cherel
- C. Bost
- J. Charrassin
- Kelvin J. Michael
In Ecology
In Ocean Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Foraging ground fidelity and route-choice tactics of a marine predator: the Antarctic fur seal Arctocephalus gazella (2001, background): “On a large scale, most of the seals travelled eastwards within the same sector in front of the colony: an arc ranging between 40 and 180° and 300 km wide, indicating that the animals tended to use the same general area over consecutive years, as observed for Antarctic fur seals in South Georgia (Boy”
- Variability in the diving activity of Antarctic fur seals, Arctocephalus gazella, at Iles Kerguelen (2002, unknown): “The diving behaviour of marine predators, quantified by the use of time-depth recorders (TDRs), is one of the most commonly used measures for differentiating foraging activity between individuals and populations, both spatially and temporally (Antonelis et al. 1990; Hindell et al. 1991; Schreer and ”
- Utilisation of the oceanic habitat by king penguins over the annual cycle (2001, background): “Such studies are now possible because animals can readily carry miniaturised sampling instruments that record both behavioural and environmental parameters (e.g. Wilson et al. 1994, Campagna et al. 2000, Georges et al. 2000, Koudil et al. 2000).”
- Spatial distribution of foraging in female Antarctic fur seals Arctocephalus gazella in relation to oceanographic variables: a scale-dependent approach using geographic information systems (2001, background): “…of the publisher Mar Ecol Prog Ser 219: 251–264, 2001 Quaid 1996, Bost et al. 1997, Guinet et al. 1997, Weimerskirch 1998), and marine mammals (e.g. cetaceans: Jaquet & Whitehead 1996, Tynan 1998; and pinnipeds: Hindell et al. 1991, McConnell et al. 1992, Boyd et al. 1998, Georges et al. 2000).”
- Confusion reigns? A review of marine megafauna interactions with tidal-stream environments (2015, background): “While lactating and migratory fur seals are now known to utilise both mesoscale frontal features (de Bruyn et al. 2009, Georges et al. 2000, Lea et al. 2006) and submesoscale surface fronts such as eddies and filaments (Ream et al. 2005, Nordstrom et al. 2013, Sterling et al. 2014) in pelagic…”
- Age, body mass and environmental variation shape the foraging ontogeny of Galapagos sea lions (2012, background): “Further, the mean difference between samples stored either dry or in ethanol of 0.1 and −0.06‰ for δ15N and δ13C, respectively, was below the range of published measurement errors of 0.3 and 0.1‰ for δ15N and δ13C, respectively (Habran et al. 2010, Lowther & Goldsworthy 2011).”
- Loyalty pays: potential life history consequences of fidelity to marine foraging regions by southern elephant seals (2004, background): “…directly or indirectly on the distribution and abundance of primary and firstorder secondary production vary significantly with certain physical characteristics of the marine environment (Hindell et al. 1991a; McConnell & Fedak 1996; Guinet et al. 1997, 2001; Tynan 1997, 1998; Georges et al. 2000).”
- The importance of oceanographic fronts to marine birds and mammals of the southern oceans (2009, background): “These studies have reported in great detail on how individually tracked seabirds and mammals use fronts (Bost et al., 1997; Croll et al., 1998; Georges et al., 2000; Boehlert et al., 2001; Boyd et al., 2001; Charrassin and Bost, 2001; Weimerskirch et al., 2002; Wilson et al., 2002; Charrassin et al.”
- Foraging ecology of subantarctic fur seals Arctocephalus tropicalis breeding on Amsterdam Island: seasonal changes in relation to maternal characteristics and pup growth (2004, background): “During the summer and early autumn, foraging activity was spread over the entire range of the STF’s SST; this is similar to the behavioural pattern described by Georges et al. (2000).”
- Impacts of climatic anomalies on provisioning strategies of a Southern Ocean predator (2006, background): “DISCUSSION Climatic anomalies and their effects on local and regional environmental conditions are known to impact the behaviour and reproductive success of marine predators (Guinet et al. 1994, 1998a, Georges et al. 2000, Inchausti et al. 2003, Weimerskirch et al. 2003).”
- A comparison of indirect measures of feeding behaviour based on ARGOS tracking data (2007, background): “The location of this feeding area is identifiable by a spatially discrete region of altered activity flanked by direct transit phases (Georges et al., 2000).”
- Summer foraging areas for lactating New Zealand sea lions Phocarctos hookeri (2005, background): “…sites (A. gazella, Boyd et al. 2002, Guinet et al. 2001; South American sea lions Otaria flavescens, Campagna et al. 2001, Thompson et al. 1998; A. forsteri, Harcourt et al. 1995, 2002; sub-Antarctic fur seal, A. tropicalis, Georges et al. 2000; A. pusillus doriferus, Arnould & Hindell 2001).”