Spatial distribution of foraging in female Antarctic fur seals Arctocephalus gazella in relation to oceanographic variables: a scale-dependent approach using geographic information systems

By C. Guinet, L. Dubroca, Mary‐Anne Lea, S. Goldsworthy, Y. Cherel, Guy Duhamel, F. Bonadonna, J. Donnay. 2001

231 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fc0ab48cb6cbe400f2e740b09710ec86a14de26c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

In Ecology

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Habitat preference, accessibility, and competition limit the global distribution of breeding Black-browed Albatrosses (2011, background): “…with environmental data collected by satellite remote-sensing (Martin 2004) to give a simultaneous view of both the environment and the movement of known individuals throughout the full extent of their potential home range (e.g., Guinet et al. 2001, Hays et al. 2001, Hyrenbach et al. 2002).”
Identifying critical areas and habitat preferences of bottlenose dolphins Tursiops truncatus (2002, background): “For example, factors such as water temperature, depth, sea-bed gradient and sediment type have been shown to influence the distribution of several cetacean and pinniped species (Gaskin 1968, Kenney 1990, Baumgartner 1997, Tollit et al. 1998, Guinet et al. 2001).”
Fatty acid composition of lipid-rich myctophids and mackerel icefish (Champsocephalus gunnari) – Southern Ocean food-web implications (2002, methodology): “fraseri (n=3) were collected by RV La Curieuse during bathypelagic trawls within the preferred foraging zone of female Antarctic fur seals (Guinet et al. 2001), to the northeast of the Kerguelen Archipelago (49 07¢S, 70 45¢E, Fig.”
Summer foraging areas for lactating New Zealand sea lions Phocarctos hookeri (2005, background): “…Ecol Prog Ser 304: 235–247, 2005 usually results in foraging occurring within 100 km of breeding sites (A. gazella, Boyd et al. 2002, Guinet et al. 2001; South American sea lions Otaria flavescens, Campagna et al. 2001, Thompson et al. 1998; A. forsteri, Harcourt et al. 1995, 2002;…”
Antarctic fur seals foraging in the Polar Frontal Zone: inter-annual shifts in diet as shown from fecal and fatty acid analyses (2002, background): “Guinet et al. (2001) have recently demonstrated that in February 1998 female Antarctic fur seals at Îles Kerguelen tended to forage in the vicinity of the PF in areas of high fish abundance over the continental slope.”
Foraging ecology of subantarctic fur seals Arctocephalus tropicalis breeding on Amsterdam Island: seasonal changes in relation to maternal characteristics and pup growth (2004, background): “…fur seals Foraging trips of lactating female fur seals consist of a round trip from a central place to a foraging ground where the seal concentrates its search for food; consequently, a higher fix density can be observed in this area (Bonadonna et al. 2000, Georges et al. 2000, Guinet et al. 2001).”
Foraging under contrasting oceanographic conditions: the gentoo penguin at Kerguelen Archipelago (2005, background): “1), the east of the archipelago is a very productive area (Blain et al. 2001) where other top predators, like black-browed albatrosses and fur seals, forage intensively (Guinet et al. 2001, Pinaud & Weimerskirch 2002).”
Antarctic icefishes (Channichthyidae): a unique family of fishes. A review, Part I (2005, background): “Predation may have increased in the north of Kerguelen Islands where the number of Antarctic fur seals has increased in recent years (Guinet et al. 2001).”
Making protected area networks effective for marine top predators (2011, background): “These behaviours can be ascribed on the basis of direct observations (at-sea surveys) or inferred from tracking and bio-logging (diving intensity, movement and turning rates; e.g. Guinet et al. 2001, Nel et al. 2001).”
A comparison of indirect measures of feeding behaviour based on ARGOS tracking data (2007, background): “Studies that overlay time-use and prey abundance data sets (Guinet et al., 2001) suggest that individuals are exploiting regions of relatively high prey abundance, but the behaviour actually being measured is likely searching.”
Prey capture attempts can be detected in Steller sea lions and other marine predators using accelerometers (2010, background): “To date, most foraging behavior studies of marine predators have described spatial distributions and diving activities (Baechler et al. 2002; Boyd 1996; Guinet et al. 2001 ) using such characteristics as time on the bottom or the number of “wiggles” per dive as indirect proxies for foraging eVort.”
Biotelemetry: a mechanistic approach to ecology. (2004, background): “Combining such data with remotely sensed physical and biological oceanographic data has enabled investigation of the effects of environmental variables on animals even when they are thousands of kilometers from the nearestresearchstationorvessel [ 52 ].Itisalsonowpossibleto gather not just informati”
Linking foraging behaviour to physical oceanographic structures: Southern elephant seals and mesoscale eddies east of Kerguelen Islands (2010, background): “This low correlation can perhaps be explained by the time-lag and likely spatial-lag between primary, secondary and tertiary production (Frontier and Pichod Viale, 1998; Guinet et al., 2001).”
New Insights into Pelagic Migrations: Implications for Ecology and Conservation (2012, background): “…behaviors of many pelagic species (Bailey et al. 2008; Bailleul et al. 2007; Block et al. 2005, 2011; Bost et al. 2009a; Boustany et al. 2010; Cotté et al. 2007; Dias et al. 2011; Guinet et al. 2001; Jorgensen et al. 2010; Le Boeuf et al. 2000; Shaffer et al. 2006; Shillinger et al. 2008).”
Isotopic niches and trophic levels of myctophid fishes and their predators in the Southern Ocean (2010, background): “The selected sampling sites for myctophids were included within the foraging areas of Aptenodytes patagonicus (king penguins) and female Arctocephalus gazella (Antarctic fur seals) at a time of the year (summer) when both species are known to prey on them (Guinet et al. 2001; Bost et al. 2009).”
Foraging ground fidelity and route-choice tactics of a marine predator: the Antarctic fur seal Arctocephalus gazella (2001, background): “The depth contour most likely coincides with the most suitable prey habitat for the Antarctic fur seal (Guinet et al. 2001), and resulting patches could be more concentrated and consequently easier to find.”
Loyalty pays: potential life history consequences of fidelity to marine foraging regions by southern elephant seals (2004, background): “…directly or indirectly on the distribution and abundance of primary and firstorder secondary production vary significantly with certain physical characteristics of the marine environment (Hindell et al. 1991a; McConnell & Fedak 1996; Guinet et al. 1997, 2001; Tynan 1997, 1998; Georges et al. 2000).”