Foraging ecology of subantarctic fur seals Arctocephalus tropicalis breeding on Amsterdam Island: seasonal changes in relation to maternal characteristics and pup growth

By Gwénaël Beauplet, L. Dubroca, C. Guinet, Y. Cherel, W. Dabin, Céline Gagne, Mark A. Hindell. 2004

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7dc2be6c335450167c21f2325c76f0e664840c2c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. Daniel P. Costa
2. C. Guinet
3. Mark A. Hindell
4. Mary‐Anne Lea
5. Y. Cherel
6. C. Bost
7. C. Barbraud

In Ecology

1. Daniel P. Costa
2. Y. Cherel
3. C. Guinet
4. C. Bost
5. A. Lescroël
6. Y. Tremblay
7. Mary‐Anne Lea
8. S. Shaffer

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Y. Cherel
2. Daniel P. Costa
3. A. Lescroël
4. C. Guinet
5. C. Bost
6. Mary‐Anne Lea
7. Y. Tremblay
8. C. Barbraud

Citations in the corpus

• A comparison of indirect measures of feeding behaviour based on ARGOS tracking data (2007, methodology): “Kernel analyses (Wood et al., 2000; Hyrenbach et al., 2002; Bradshaw et al., 2003; Beauplet et al., 2004) and time-in-area plots (Bradshaw et al., 2002, 2004; Van den Hoff et al., 2002) are attractive in that they can readily combine data from multiple individuals, species, or even years, but the…”
• Foraging under contrasting oceanographic conditions: the gentoo penguin at Kerguelen Archipelago (2005, background): “…to this heterogeneity, many marine birds and mammals can exhibit considerable variation in their foraging behaviour or at-sea distribution (e.g. Croxall et al. 1988, Wilson 1995, Boyd 1996, Weimerskirch 1998, Rodary et al. 2000, Charassin & Bost 2001, Beauplet et al. 2004, Grémillet et al. 2004a).”
• Foraging distance affects reproductive success in Magellanic penguins (2009, background): “Trip distance often varies across the breeding season, reflecting different constraints (Weimerskirch et al. 1993, Guinet et al. 1997, Beauplet et al. 2004, Lescroël & Bost 2005, Phalan et al. 2007).”
• Interannual variation in the post‐weaning and juvenile survival of subantarctic fur seals: influence of pup sex, growth rate and oceanographic conditions (2005, background): “otariids, which alternate long foraging trips at sea with short periods ashore to feed their pup (Beauplet et al. 2004).”
• A conceptual model of the variation in parental attendance in response to environmental fluctuation : foraging energetics of lactating sea lions and fur seals (2007, background): “Given that an increase in trip duration is the least preferred response to environmental perturbation, it is important to consider what other options a pinniped or seabird has (Merrick and Loughlin, 1997; Mattlin et al., 1998; Beauplet et al., 2004).”
• Age‐specific survival and reproductive performances in fur seals: evidence of senescence and individual quality (2006, background): “…it could be interesting to explore to what extent individual quality could be determined by characteristics related to either individual phenotypic patterns (Festa-Bianchet 1998, Pomeroy et al. 1999, Crocker et al. 2001) or foraging tactics during the pup-rearing process (Beauplet et al. 2004).”
• Impacts of climatic anomalies on provisioning strategies of a Southern Ocean predator (2006, background): “Such choices may vary in relation to food availability, maternal age, size and experience and age of offspring (Georges & Guinet 2000, Beauplet et al. 2004).”