M. Bühner

Experimental and Cognitive Psychology · 2004–2019

A researcher in the Science corpus: 10 papers; trusts 34 researchers and is trusted by 5 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom M. Bühner trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. André Beauducel
  2. Klaus Oberauer
  3. Werner W. Wittmann
  4. G. Logan
  5. Torkel Klingberg
  6. Cornelius J. Konig
  7. H. Süss
  8. Akira Miyake
  9. Gordon D. Logan
  10. Oliver Wilhelm

Who trusts M. Bühner overall

  1. Cornelius J. Konig
  2. I. Burić
  3. Zach Shipstead
  4. Brittany R. L. Duff
  5. D. Preece

Papers from M. Bühner's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers M. Bühner trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis. (Cognitive Psychology)
  2. Working memory and intelligence: the same or different constructs? (Psychological bulletin)
  3. Working memory capacity - facets of a cognitive ability construct
  4. Computerized training of working memory in children with ADHD--a randomized, controlled trial. (Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry)
  5. The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. (Psychology Review)
  6. The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis. (Journal of experimental psychology. General)
  7. On the division of short-term and working memory: an examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities. (Psychological bulletin)
  8. Simulation Study on Fit Indexes in CFA Based on Data With Slightly Distorted Simple Structure
  9. Training and plasticity of working memory. (Trends in Cognitive Sciences)
  10. Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. (Psychology Review)

Their papers