Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations.

By Gordon D. Logan, R. D. Gordon. Psychology Review, 2001

807 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1084bc3f1654d158ea67b60f315ce17d9943853f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. (2003, methodology): “…it still has the ability to affect RTs, and this feature gives ECTVA the power to explain crosstalk (Task 2 stimulus or response characteristics influencing Task 1 RTs and accuracy) that is sometimes observed in the dual-task literature (Hommel, 1998; Logan & Gordon, 2001; Logan & Schulkind, 2000).”
Design for a working memory. (2009, background): “…in procedural WM. Limiting the contents of the two foci to a single representation is a straightforward way of avoiding selection ambiguity, and likewise, limiting the content of the bridge to a single task set is an effective way of avoiding cross talk between task sets (cf. Logan & Gordon, 2001).”
The Neural Site of Attention Matches the Spatial Scale of Perception (2006, background): “That is, the prefrontal cortex provides general signals about the nature of the discrimination to be performed (Logan and Gordon, 2001), and local circuitry within each area of visual cortex determines whether the current stimuli require the spatial focusing of attention within that area.”
Task switching: interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. (2010, methodology): “…reconfiguration view assumes that the switch cost reflects the time needed to reconfigure a task set (i.e., activate or chain task-set parameters; Logan & Gordon, 2001; Monsell & Mizon, 2006; Rogers & Monsell, 1995) or to retrieve the task set from long-term memory (Mayr & Kliegl, 2000;…”
A taxonomy of external and internal attention. (2011, neutral): “The precise duration of this delay, as a function of the timing between the first and second task, exquisitely reveals a central bottleneck , independent of modality and task type, although researchers debate the nature of the limitation (Logan & Gordon 2001, Meyer & Kieras 1997).”
The role of working memory in sport (2010, methodology): “…researchers propose in large-scale theories of cognition that WM representations control the perceptual system via biasing the allocation of attention to objects that match features of the WM representations or are related to them (e.g., Anderson, Matessa, & Lebiere, 1997; Logan & Gordon, 2001).”
Capacity limits of information processing in the brain. (2005, background): “(c) Central executive (CE) models assert that RS1 and RS2 occur serially because this is the optimal strategy to avoid poor performance [ 57 ,58].”
The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind. (2008, neutral): “…be attended (e.g., “attend to the red letter”) (Broadbent, 1971; Bundesen, 1990) but not how the object should be categorized or responded to (e.g., “if the letter is a vowel, press the left key”), restricting the relevant processes to those involved in stimulus selection (Logan and Gordon, 2001).”
A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task (2004, background): “Comparable effects have been reported by Logan and colleagues ( Logan & Gordon, 2001; Logan & Schulkind, 2000).”
Hierarchical Control of Cognitive Processes (2011, neutral): “…in the 1950s (Lashley, 1951; Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960) and it remains a common feature in modern theories of executive control in cognitive science and cognitive neuroscience (Badre, 2008; Cooper & Shallice, 2000; Logan & Gordon, 2001; Miller & Cohen, 2001; Norman & Shallice, 1986).”
Models of Response Inhibition in the Stop-Signal and Stop-Change Paradigms (2008, background): “Moreover, the alternative go2 response seemed to be activated after the stop process finished, most likely because of strategic limitations (Logan and Gordon, 2001; Meyer and Kieras, 1997), not structural limitations (i.e., a central-processing bottleneck; Pashler, 1994).”
A core system for the implementation of task sets. (2006, background): “…that select and modulate downstream moment-to-moment processes relevant to the specific task at hand (Baddeley, 1996; Desimone and Duncan, 1995; Logan and Gordon, 2001; Meyer and Kieras, 1997; Miller and Cohen, 2001; Norman and Shallice, 1986; Schneider and Shiffrin, 1977; Shiffrin and…”
Working Memory, Fluid Intelligence, and Attention Are Predictors of Multitasking Performance, but Polychronicity and Extraversion Are Not (2005, neutral): “Instead of multitasking, some researchers also use the expression dual-task when only two tasks are involved (e.g., Logan & Gordon, 2001), or task switching (e.g., Monsell, 2003).”
Control and interference in task switching--a review. (2010, background): “This suggestion relates current research on task switching to theories in diverse areas of cognitive psychology, such as memory and categorization (e.g., Logan & Gordon, 2001).”