Testing Structural Equation Models

By Kenneth A. Bollen, J. Scott Long. 1993

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Counterfactual Fairness (2017, background): “An extensive literature already exists in this topic which the practitioner can refer to (a classic account for instance is [3]), and which can be used as-is in our context.”
Leadership effects on innovation propensity: A two-factor full range leadership model (2013, methodology): “The model displays a very good fit to the data with goodness-of-fit indices exceeding critical values indicative of good fit (Bollen & Long, 1993).”
Employee Commitment in Times of Change: Assessing the Importance of Attitudes Toward Organizational Change † (2009, methodology): “Jöreskog (1993) referred to this analytic technique as the alternative models approach, and Hoyle and Panter (1995) stated this technique represents the strongest usage of SEM analysis, provided the alternative model is proposed a priori.”
Assessing the Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure for Measurement Equivalence Across Racial and Ethnic Groups (2007, methodology): “Given the well-known sensitivity of the w2 statistic to minor deviations in a sample’s covariance matrix and sample size (Bollen & Long, 1993; Hu & Bentler, 1995), we also evaluated three other commonly used fit indices: the TuckerLewis Index (TLI), the comparative fit index (CFI), and the root…”
The moderating effect of cultural congruence on the internal marketing practice and employee satisfaction relationship: An empirical examination of Australian and Taiwanese born tourism employees (2014, methodology): “The model fit was assessed using the Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI), Comparative Fit Index (CFI), and root-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA) as recommended by Bollen and Long (1993).”